US senator recommends ripping skin off Gaza protesters

Michael F. Brown Power Suits 20 April 2024

US Senator Tom Cotton in the Hart Senate Office Building

US Senator Tom Cotton has encouraged vigilante violence targeting protesters demonstrating against the Gaza genocide.

Bill Clark CQ Roll Call

Tom Cotton, the bellicose US senator from Arkansas, is not satisfied with pushing to employ the US military against Black Lives Matter and antifa protesters. He’s now encouraging vigilante violence against Gaza genocide activists.

On Monday, he proposed throwing protesters in American cities off bridges. He urged people stuck in traffic related to Gaza genocide protests to take violent action.

“I encourage people who get stuck behind the pro-Hamas mobs blocking traffic: take matters into your own hands to get them out of the way.”

Protesters for Palestinian freedom are “pro-Hamas mobs” to Cotton, a man who inveighs against over-taxing but on the American tax day promotes bodily harm against those protesting US tax money fueling war crimes and genocide.

Speaking to Fox News about protesters blocking traffic in demonstrations from California to Illinois to New York and elsewhere, Cotton said, “If something like this happened in Arkansas on a bridge there, let’s just say I think there’d be a lot of very wet criminals that have been tossed overboard, not by law enforcement but by the people whose road they’re blocking.”

Then voicing specific support for violence and inflicting pain on protesters, Cotton asserted, “If they glued their hands to a car or the pavement, well, probably pretty painful to have their skin ripped off, but I think that’s the way we’d handle it in Arkansas. And I would encourage most people anywhere that get stuck behind criminals like this, who are trying to block traffic, to take matters in their own hands.”

“It’s really unbelievable in this day and age that a sitting US Senator can threaten violence to protesters and not be sanctioned or censured or anything else by his colleagues,” said Hatem Abudayyeh, National Chair of the US Palestinian Community Network (USPCN), to The Electronic Intifada.

“It’s been an incredible challenge, in the past six months especially, to experience what Palestinians have in the US – that our lives are expendable, that our rights aren’t defended, that our very existence is threatened. But we can’t and won’t back down, and we will continue fighting to stop the genocide and make sure that racist, white supremacist apologists for Israel like Tom Cotton will see a free Palestine in his lifetime.”

The American Civil Liberties Union did not respond to requests from The Electronic Intifada for First Amendment analysis on how much latitude Cotton has to encourage vigilante violence against protesters.

On Thursday, Cotton also weighed in regarding a report that the International Criminal Court could bring “international arrest warrants in the relatively near future against Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and other top officials for alleged war crimes.”

Cotton, attempting to intimidate the court and its officials, said he was “putting ICC officials on notice.”

He added, “If you side with Hamas and Iran (allies of Putin) and enter the political battlefield against Israel, you will be sanctioned. Get your dollars out of the US now and say goodbye to ever visiting America again.”

He’s clearly worried that a fair appraisal will find Israel has committed war crimes in Gaza – and with US arms.

From the river to the sea

Meanwhile, Tuesday, the House of Representatives passed a resolution deeming the chant “From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free” to be anti-Semitic.

Just 43 Democrats voted against the resolution and one Republican.

Unsurprisingly, many Democrats ended up on the side of noted anti-Semite and Islamophobe Marjorie Taylor Greene, a congressional QAnon enthusiast from the state of Georgia.

The representatives aren’t interested in addressing anti-Semitism with the resolution, but in restricting speech related to Palestinian freedom. Many supporters of the chant are strong supporters of equal rights for all those living between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea and oppose an apartheid state of Israel carrying out what the International Court of Justice has deemed a plausible genocide in Gaza.

Most of the Palestinians in the coastal territory are there as a consequence of Zionist militias and the Israeli military dispossessing and displacing their grandparents and great grandparents into Gaza in 1948. Many have family land that was stolen from them just a few miles away.

The hypocrisy – and worse – of House members is clear. They had nothing to say about Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s map presented in September 2023 at the United Nations depicting all of the land between the river and the sea – and the occupied Golan Heights – as part of Israel.

Yair Netanyahu, the prime minister’s son, triumphantly claims on his Twitter/X feed to his nearly 200,000 followers that “from the river to the sea, this flag [of Israel] is all you’ll see!”

The apartheid vision of father and son is widely accepted or disregarded in the US Congress – from co-sponsors of the “river to the sea” resolution Michael Lawler and Max Miller on the far right to Jamie Raskin and Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick, who are supposedly on the left.

Miller, of course, received no censure last year for his genocidal call to turn Gaza into a “parking lot.”

Calls for equal rights for Palestinians are now hate speech to most members of the US House of Representatives. University students and activists will pay a price, but such congressional foolishness is apt to lead to even more people questioning US policies opposing Palestinian freedom.

More unconditioned military aid to Israel – some $17 billion approved today by the US House of Representatives with just 58 members dissenting – will only make for more Israeli war crimes and with deeper US complicity. Roughly $9 billion in humanitarian aid for areas devastated by war was approved, including an anticipated $2 billion for Palestinians in Gaza.

The New York Times confuses very few when it says this military aid comes in the context of “scores” of Palestinian civilian casualties.

In fact, the Israeli military’s genocidal action – with the backing of US arms – has resulted in tens of thousands of Palestinian civilian casualties since 7 October.

Tags

Comments

picture

Broomhilda replied on

Comical Tom Cotton: America's modern day Edward Covey zionist slave-breaker. McFeely revealed A LOT about the pathology of Edward Covey....Cotton needs to be broken. Still, Frederick Douglass came to see his physical fight with Covey as life-transforming, and introduced the story in his autobiography as such: "You have seen how a man was made a slave; you shall see how a slave was made a man."

picture

Jim Thomas replied on

The fact that we have trash like Cotton in the Senate says pretty much all that needs to be said about the sorry state of politics in this Country. Fools like Cotton have no understanding of our Constitution and no respect for democracy.

picture

Barb replied on

I don't know what to say to that. I'm shocked. Tom Cotton is suggesting that people who demonstrate against the Israeli/American Holocaust against the Palestinians face battery and even murder simply because we don't want our tax dollars used to commit genocide and other crimes against humanity? I think I'm getting a feel for how good people must have felt in Nazi Germany when Jewish people were being slaughtered and they couldn't help them. What I can't understand is why Israel and the US want to inflict another Holocaust on the Palestinians. I don't understand how people can be so cruel. My heart breaks more every day.

picture

william miller replied on

The judge who nixed Hunter Biden's plea agreement made large campaign contributions to Senator Cotton. Birds of a feather flock together.

picture

Javier Orosco replied on

I welcome any Zionist to come and try to stop me and my comrades from standing for Palestine publicly.

picture

peter a schnapp replied on

As a youngster on the farm, I use to watch feral dog packs roaming about. You'd see the underlings following the pack leader, always glancing at him to make certain they weren't "stepping out of line", then, once the pack leader growled at a victim, the sycophants in the pack would attack, always glancing back at the leader to make certain he's aware of their loyalty, hoping maybe for a larger piece of meat? But always sniffing the pack leader's ass to make certain he's aware of their fealty. Kinda reminds me of CONgress' interaction with AIPAC et al - More concerned with fawning over their master than watching over their own pups.... Pretty obvious whom the "pups" are, no?

Add new comment

Michael F. Brown

Michael F. Brown is an independent journalist. His work and views have appeared in The International Herald Tribune, TheNation.com, The San Diego Union-Tribune, The News & Observer, The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, The Washington Post and elsewhere.