A plain reading of the “correction” is that it is an effort to mislead readers into thinking the United States has never considered Israeli settlements to be illegal.
Senior BBC editors and presenters make some startling admissions when questioned on why they pander to Israel.
Social and mainstream media conflate multiple “Tamarrod” campaigns identified with Palestine when there are at least four with different agendas.
Is the resort to timid and euphemistic language a form of reflexive self-censorship to avoid the wrath of the anti-Palestinian lobby?
A program questioning Zionist claims was recently pulled from the broadcasting schedule at the last minute.
Fears about the effect of op-ed’s criticism of Zionism on the launch of Al Jazeera America motivated top manager Ehab Al Shihabi’s move to remove article.
In an unprecedented act of political censorship Al Jazeera English has deleted an article by noted Columbia University Professor Joseph Massad after coming under intense criticism from Zionists in recent days.
From its refusal to acknowledge international law to the withholding of facts from its audiences, the BBC’s reporting wholly favors the Israeli agenda.
BBC’s recent behavior has left it with no defense against claims of pro-Israel bias.
Why are BBC presenters telling audiences that only part of the West Bank is occupied?