US lawmakers could rush two bills into law that aim to silence and criminalize Palestine rights advocacy.
End-of-year spending bills are usually thousands of pages long and include legislation that could not pass earlier by regular means.
If passed, the bills would have a chilling effect on students and scholars who criticize Israel and bolster efforts by Israel lobby groups to blacklist, surveil and harass supporters of Palestinian rights.
Under threat of federal investigation, university administrations would be pushed to crack down harder on student Palestine solidarity groups.
And churches, human rights organizations, corporations and investment fund managers could face fines if they decide not to invest in companies that profit from Israel’s violations of human rights.
The Israel Anti-Boycott Act, which would criminalize the boycott of Israel, was introduced last year by Democratic Senator Ben Cardin.
Cardin “is making a behind-the-scenes push” to slip the legislation into the last-minute spending bill, The Intercept reported last week.
The act would impose prison sentences and heavy fines on organizations or their personnel that participate in a boycott of Israel or its settlements in the occupied West Bank and the Syrian Golan Heights.
The powerful Israel lobby group AIPAC has made the bill one of its top legislative priorities.
Booker seized on the massacre by a white supremacist of Jewish worshippers at a synagogue in October by announcing his support for the Israel Anti-Boycott Act.
More than 100 civil and human rights groups are calling on lawmakers to block the last-minute effort to pass the unconstitutional measure.
The Israel Anti-Boycott Act “has failed to pass for two years because of pressure from civil liberties groups and concerned citizens who oppose the punishment of political boycott activities intended to achieve Palestinian rights,” said one of those groups, Palestine Legal.
The American Civil Liberties Union says it will likely challenge the bill in court if it passes.
The Anti-Semitism Awareness Act would adopt the “State Department definition” of anti-Semitism, which is substantially the same as the so-called IHRA definition of anti-Semitism that Israel lobby groups pressured the UK’s Labour Party to adopt as part of their campaign against leader Jeremy Corbyn and to curtail support for Palestinian rights.
The definition conflates criticism of Israel with anti-Jewish bigotry.
Even the definition’s lead author, former American Jewish Committee executive Kenneth Stern, strongly opposes efforts to enshrine it in legislation or university rule books, arguing that this would unconstitutionally infringe on free speech.
Republican Senator Tim Scott is joining Democrat Ben Cardin in efforts to tack the two pro-Israel measures onto the year-end spending bill.
However, the fact that Cardin and Scott “are attempting to push their controversial and unconstitutional bills through the must-pass budget process is an indication that they’ve been unable to get these bills passed through the normal legislative process,” Josh Ruebner, policy director of the US Campaign for Palestinian Rights told The Electronic Intifada.
“They’re afraid of having an open debate and a vote on these bills and they’re doing whatever they can behind the scenes to sneak them through into passage without scrutiny,” he said.
- Israel Lobby
- Israel Anti-Boycott Act
- Anti-Semitism Awareness Act
- Ben Cardin
- campus activism
- First Amendment
- anti-BDS laws
- Palestine Legal
- Center for Constitutional Rights
- Tim Scott
- Nancy Pelosi
- State Department definition of anti-Semitism
- IHRA definition of anti-Semitism
- Josh Ruebner
- Kenneth Marcus
- Title VI of the Civil Rights Act
- Zachor Legal Institute
- Louis D. Brandeis Center for Human Rights
- Liz Jackson