UN takes first step to end Israel’s impunity

A UN list of companies that do business with Israel’s illegal settlements would boost the global movement for Palestinian rights.

Ryan Rodrick Beiler ActiveStills

UN officials are finally moving to hold Israel accountable for breaking international law, though they are facing fierce resistance from Israel and its allies.

“After decades of Palestinian dispossession and Israeli military occupation and apartheid, the United Nations has taken its first concrete, practical step to secure accountability for ongoing Israeli violations of Palestinian human rights,” said Omar Barghouti, a founder of the boycott, divestment and sanctions (BDS) movement. “Palestinians warmly welcome this step.”

On Wednesday, Israel’s Haaretz newspaper reported that the UN’s human rights office began sending letters to some 150 companies around the world warning them that they may be added to a database of firms doing business with Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank, including East Jerusalem.

This week Nickolay Mladenov, the top UN political official in Jerusalem, told the UN Security Council that “Israel’s illegal settlement activities have continued at a high rate” in gross breach of UN resolutions.

There is a growing legal consensus that international law requires governments to prohibit all trade with the settlements.

“This could snowball”

Israeli officials have admitted that many firms – though they did not provide names – have already responded to the letters by assuring the UN human rights office that they will not renew their contracts in Israel or seek new ones.

“These companies just can’t make the distinction between Israel and the settlements and are ending their operations altogether,” a senior Israeli official told Haaretz. “Foreign companies will not invest in something that reeks of political problems – this could snowball.”

The senior Israeli official confirmed what a top EU diplomat had reported back to colleagues in Brussels.

In a June memo written when he was the EU ambassador in Tel Aviv, Lars Faaborg-Andersen admitted that the EU had no reliable way to distinguish exports from settlements from other Israeli goods.

The Israeli official’s comments also echo the findings of a secret report by two influential Israel lobby groups leaked to The Electronic Intifada earlier this year.

The report, which was endorsed by the Israeli government, concluded that most of the “collateral damage” being done to Israel by the BDS movement is a result of a growing “silent boycott” – groups, individuals and companies who make undeclared decisions to refrain from engaging with Israel, either because of their support for Palestinian rights, or simply to “avoid unnecessary problems and criticisms.”

Household names

Last month, The Washington Post named some of the American companies warned by the UN that they may be listed in the database.

They include household names such as Caterpillar, TripAdvisor, Priceline.com and Airbnb.

According to Haaretz, about 30 of the 150 companies are American while others are from Germany, South Korea and Norway.

The Washington Post also outlined the strong American opposition to the database, whose creation was mandated by a UN Human Rights Council vote last year. Nikki Haley, the US ambassador to the UN, has called the database “shameful” and said her country is considering pulling out of the UN Human Rights Council.

Israel has set up a government task force to try to thwart the list, but according to Haaretz, most of the officials involved in the effort believe publication of the database in December is “inevitable.”

With the list looming, US lawmakers have proposed legislation – the Israel Anti-Boycott Act – that could impose harsh fines and prison terms for companies and their personnel who participate in a boycott of Israel and its settlements that is deemed to be encouraged by an international organization.

Israel’s “desperation”

The intensity of the US pressure – and the long history of the so-called international community’s pandering to Israel – means that it cannot be taken for granted that UN officials will not capitulate again.

Two years ago, then UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon caved in to Israeli and American pressure and removed Israel from a UN list of serious violators of children’s rights.

In March, Ban’s successor Antonio Guterres bowed to US pressure and suppressed a report that found that Israel practices apartheid against Palestinians.

One of the conclusions of that report is that research and legal analyses by UN bodies – such as the United Nations Center Against Apartheid – were critical resources for civil society activists in their efforts aimed at “legitimating boycott, divestments and sanctions, and contributing to the overall formation of a transnational movement against apartheid in South Africa.”

The report urged a similar approach toward ending Israeli apartheid. Veteran campaigner Adri Nieuwhof recently wrote for The Electronic Intifada that UN registers of firms, athletes and entertainers complicit in South African apartheid gave a huge boost to the international solidarity campaign.

“That Israel wants to nip the planned database in the bud is a sign of desperation,” Nieuwhof wrote. “Israel is already a pariah state in the minds of ordinary people around the world. If Israel’s crimes do not cease, its isolation will grow.”

“We hope the UN Human Rights Council will stand firm and publish its full list of companies illegally operating in or with Israeli settlements on stolen Palestinian land, and will develop this list as called for by the UN Human Rights Council in March 2016,” BDS co-founder Omar Barghouti stated.

“If implemented properly, this UN database of companies that are complicit in some of Israel’s human rights violations may augur the beginning of the end of Israel’s criminal impunity.”




A glimmer of hope for the BDS movement .Truth against hasbara , the winner should be obvious.


Palestinians should be suing Israel for Terrorism, Murder, Violation of Human Rights, in every court on Earth. File in every court there is and make Israel defend in public.


Proposed anti-BDS legislation in the US is generally opposed by progressive groups on the basis that it is a violation of freedom of speech. I am astounded that almost nobody attacks it on the basis of it also being an assault on freedom of religion -- especially because it has strong American roots in the divestment campaigns of many local Christian peace-and-justice committees that were organized prior to the international campaign.

Our religious and ethical traditions all have guidelines about the proper and improper uses of money -- as consumers and investors. The anti-BDS legislation criminalizes those of us who are acting in accordance with our religious and/or ethical traditions that prohibit complicity in evil hidden behind spending or investment choices.

Proposed anti-BDS legislation is an assault on BOTH freedom of speech and freedom of religion.

Yet it is very possible that in the US employers who want to impose their religious beliefs on employees and deny them certain kinds of health care will be protected by the courts relying on the 1st ammendment while those who refuse to be complicit in the Israeli Occupation will be jailed and fined and those who oppose hate speech will be expelled from college campuses.


When the U.N. notifies companies of their complicity in human rights violations and war crimes, even as the U.S. threatens those same companies with prosecution for defying American law, a new field of confrontation begins to emerge. While we shouldn't allow ourselves to be carried away with this news, the pressure continues to build against Israel. And it's coming from the grass roots. Years of hard organizing and frequently punishable actions by committed people in Palestine and throughout the world led to this step. And it's good to see the "silent boycott" noted here, because in the end there's nothing Israel and its stooges in U.S. politics can do against a company which merely says, "While we decline to comment on specific decisions, our investment policies reflect the best business judgement of our legal and financial officers." It's absurd that given the current atmosphere in AIPAC-USA, companies cannot cite international law to defend their reluctance to participate in risky ventures. But in the corporate culture which reigns supreme in America, they really don't have to say anything. Just walk away from Israel. In the end, it's only good business to avoid future war crimes indictments. There are safer ways to make a buck.


Checking the Congressional Record it seems that no action has been taken
on this measure since its introduction last March. Some who originally
sponsored this legislation have withdrawn their co-sponsorship (number

Its backing when introduced indicates the power of the Israeli lobby.
Concerns were not re: support for Israel but on issues of free speech,
These points were made clearly by the ACLU.

The remarks of Nikki Haley, US Ambassador to the UN, indicate that
any chance of passage is slim to none (publication of list etc) is
slim to none.

---Peter Loeb, Boston, MA, USA


I agree. America never takes sides with apartheid offenders. Unfortunately, if the censorship offenders think they can get away with it by using the old poor victims of the holocaust argument while persuading the Palestinian demographic to sacrifice themselves for it, they're going to have another thing coming. And exploiting medieval stereotypes of the Arab being a worthless club wielding insensitive barbarian and savage and using it to demean and undermine the powers of equality of our justice system isn't going to fare well with the people. So yeah, be prepared to spend some major time in the slammer if you think you're above the law.