But how could 'Labour' have fought back publicly Tom? The only way to reach the general public is through the MSM, and if the MSM are totally hostile to you AND colluded and conspired in the A/S smear campaign, they are hardly likely to give you the opportunity to 'fight back'. So can you explain how the LP could have gone about doing it?

Take the Ken Livingstone episode for example. I had never heard of The Haavara Agreement, but a quick search re >hitler supported zionism< brought it up at the top of the results, and any journalist on this planet worthy of the name could have done the same, or of course contacted Ken himself to ask him what he was referring to. The point is that it's highly unlikely that they DIDN'T (assuming they weren't aware of the agreement already), and yet the whole of the MSM went along with the vilification and condemnation KNOWING that Ken was of course alluding to an historical fact. So how do you get the truth out there when the whole of the corporate media et al were complicit in the falsehood that Ken said something anti-semitic?

You start by saying that Tom is right Frank, and then, in effect, spend the second half of your post citing examples of how the MSM only ever gave a voice to the smearers. And THAT's the whole point of course. And even when various people said that it was all grossly exaggerated and/or a smear campaign, THEY were just vilified and condemned and attacked as being in denial and, as such, being part of the problem, or as being conspiracy theorists. When you own and control the MSM - the corporate MSM, along with the semi-corporate BBC - then YOU control the narrative.

As Justin Schlosberg points out in Chapter 4 of Bad News For Labour:

“In contrast to other contexts, the antisemitism issue by its very nature inhibits the development of a counter-narrative. This is because much of the discursive framing serves to pre-emptively delegitimise any defensive response as ‘part of the problem’”.

And as Malcolm X said:

“The media's the most powerful entity on earth. They have the power to make the innocent guilty and to make the guilty innocent, and that's power. Because they control the minds of the masses.”

and electing Boris the BSer and Trump lapdog who will dismantle the NHS and crush the working class, semites included.

There will be a special place in Hell for him and his evil, perverse friends.

When boys cry "wolf" and are believed we are all the poorer, for reasons made clear in the story.

It is not too late to challenge the Election result in a petition based on this defamation; a precedent already exists for doing just that. Back in November of 2010, when it was a Labour PM under attack for lying about a political opponent in order to retain his seat, there was a successful petition challenge to deprive him of his victory which ultimately also barred him from standing for public office. A Guardian article predicted the impact this would have on politics: “The former immigration minister Phil Woolas was ejected from parliament today after two high court judges ruled that he lied about his Liberal Democrat opponent during the general election, in a judgment that is likely to have profound implications for all future campaigns.”

That was then, with a Labour candidate under attack but the picture is fundamentally no different now, after a relentless Tory campaign of unverified fact-free lies, smears and deformation has managed to depict Jeremy Corbyn, a dignified man of peace, as a hateful, vilified racist! Labour accepted full responsibility: “The deputy leader Harriet Harman said it was “no part of Labour’s politics to try to win elections by telling lies” and the party would not support any appeal.” So where do we stand now? Surely the Woolas case set an important precedent with regard to the use of false information to incite anger and stoke a fabricated ethnic divide. Because the UK lacks a written constitution, our law is governed by precedent.

On a Discussion Forum on Craig Murray’s blog we share evidence and strategies to expose the truth re an election result we believe was rigged by manipulating the postal votes handled by the IDOX Postal Vote Managed Service. Our electoral services have been outsourced to unregulated private companies like IDOX. If you are as concerned about the safety or integrity of your vote and harbour suspicions check out the Elections Aftermath Forum on Craig Murray’s blog site and join the discussion.

This is outrageous behavior. All aid to the government of Israel should be closed down. Horrible people to do this.

You are a disgrace to the human race... Do and Can't you see the stark abuse of human rights that the zionists applying in Palestine, it is not hidden, it is documented.. What do you say for applying Apartheid laws on the different people on the same land that was occupied and still occupied.. What do you say about the unlawful wall,, what do you say about the Jewish roads and muslim and christians roads,, what do you say about killing journalists, medics, etc, etc.. etc.. what do you say about snipering children and others.

Mr. Glassman, what do you think of the Israeli aggression against the natives of Palestine, the way they have been treated over the last 60 years? Do you have any feeling for their freedom?

Jeremy Corbyn and his ministers had a fantastic fully costed manifesto apart from waspi women. If labour had got in people in this country would have been a lot happier. Jeremy Corbyn stood for hope and for making us all feel we would be worth something. He has my unstinting admiration and respect speaking out for me a disabled person.