Lobby Watch 11 September 2019
Siding with Israel lobby groups, the Canadian government is appealing a federal court ruling that wines produced in Israeli settlements cannot be labeled “Made in Israel.”
Meanwhile, Canadian authorities have bent to the demands of Israel advocates and put a hold on the distribution of Palestinian beer and wine.
The July court ruling directs government agencies to label settlement wines accurately so consumers can make informed choices.
Immediately following the ruling, Israel lobby groups and Israeli officials began pressuring the Canadian government to appeal.
Avi Benlolo, CEO of Friends of Simon Wiesenthal Center in Canada, a right-wing Israel advocacy organization, claimed there is “nothing misleading” in labeling wine as a product of Israel “if it is produced by Israelis in an area controlled by Israel,” according to The Canadian Jewish News on Monday.
But Canada considers the West Bank, Gaza Strip and Syria’s Golan Heights to be occupied territories, not part of Israel.
It maintains that Israel’s settlement colonies in these areas violate international law.
Human rights groups and legal experts denounced justice minister David Lametti’s capitulation to pressure.
“Sadly, the appeal looks to be solely for political reasons – to appeal to certain voters and lobbyists – rather than to pose any legitimate challenges to the judge’s interpretation of Canadian law,” stated Corey Balsam, national coordinator for Independent Jewish Voices Canada (IJV).
IJV acted as an official intervenor in the three-year legal case brought by David Kattenburg, a science professor and activist in Winnipeg.
Kattenburg and IJV argued for accurate labeling so that consumers can make buying choices consistent with their ethics.
The court backed their argument.
“By deciding to appeal, not only is the government betraying the rights of Canadian citizens to make conscientious decisions about the products they choose to consume, but it is defending Israel’s illegal settlement project in the West Bank,” Balsam added.IJV had just sent a letter to Lametti last week urging the minister to resist pressure from Israel and its lobby. Last month, Amnesty International and Michael Lynk, the UN special rapporteur on the occupied Palestinian territories, made a similar call on Canada to respect international law.
They also demanded that the Canadian government remove provisions in the recently renewed Canada-Israel Free Trade Agreement which they say allows the “admission of goods and services from Israeli settlements, industrial parks and other illegal enterprises in occupied East Jerusalem and the West Bank to enter Canada.”During a speech last month, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau reasserted Canada’s commitment to Israel – calling it an “unshakeable” friendship – to the delight of Israel lobby groups: Trudeau has a long history of attacking and smearing BDS – the boycott, divestment and sanctions campaign for Palestinian rights.
Palestinian products on hold
Right before the Trudeau government decided to appeal the federal court ruling on Israeli settlement products, the Liquor Control Board of Ontario (LCBO) informed a Palestinian company that its effort to import Palestinian beverages had been placed on hold.
The hold is ostensibly due to the court’s ruling.
Taybeh, a family-owned business based near Ramallah in the West Bank, produces beer and wine. It exports its products internationally and they are sold throughout the West Bank as well as present-day Israel with the “Product of Palestine” label.
Earlier this year, Canada-based Palestine Just Trade Inc. worked with the LCBO to purchase Taybeh beverages for sale in Canada.
The LCBO approved the purchase of Taybeh products, as well as the “Product of Palestine” label on each item, according to Palestine Just Trade.
But the products are currently being held in storage.
Meanwhile, wines produced in Israeli settlements are still for sale despite their misleading labels.
After the July court ruling, the Canadian government told Kattenburg it would not take any action to label settlement wines until it decided whether or not to appeal, Kattenburg’s attorney Dimitri Lascaris told The Electronic Intifada.
The LCBO also wrote to Lascaris in August telling him it had asked the Canadian Food Inspection Agency for guidance in April on how the Palestinian beverages must be labeled.
But four months later it had not heard back.
The government is “effectively maintaining the status quo while prejudicing Palestinian producers,” Lascaris said.
“It is the Canadian government that is holding up the sale of these products, even though they are appropriately labeled and even though they have nothing to do with the decision of the federal court in the Kattenburg case – that was about settlement wines labeled as products of Israel,” he added.
“This is the first time this has ever happened to Taybeh,” Madees Khoury, Taybeh’s general manager, told The Electronic Intifada.
Khoury said that the company has recently received a deluge of hate mail from Canadian Zionists.
She noted that the longer the Canadian government keeps their products in storage while pre-paid orders go unfulfilled, the worse it is for the quality of the beverages and the reputation that the company has built.
“We promote fresh, high-quality beer,” Khoury said. “But we don’t even know how they’re storing it or how they’re handling the cases. It destroys the image of Taybeh.”
Lascaris recently wrote to the Canadian Food Inspection Agency asking why it would discriminate against properly labeled Palestinian products while Israeli settlement wines are still on the shelves.
He also said his clients would take legal action if necessary.
Lascaris is awaiting a response.
But the food agency did recently respond to an inquiry from the pressure group United With Israel asserting that “no shipments of wine in question are being held by CFIA.”
It directed further questions to Canada’s foreign ministry.
The wines are, however, being stored by the Liquor Control Board of Ontario, which says it cannot sell them until it hears back from the food agency.A pro-Israel Facebook group called “Never Again Canada” urged its users to contact the government and boycott wines that “support Palestinian terror.”
The Canadian chapter of the Jewish Defense League, a violent extremist group, directed its supporters to pressure the government to investigate Palestine-labeled products.
According to Lascaris, the Canadian government’s appeal and the hold on Taybeh beverages is “purely a result of a desire on the part of the Trudeau government to avoid alienating the pro-Israel lobby in this country.”
Editor’s note: Taybeh products are labeled “Product of Palestine,” not “Made in Palestine” as originally written.
- Israel Lobby
- Taybeh beer
- settlement products
- Dimitri Lascaris
- Justin Trudeau
- David Kattenburg
- Madees Khoury
Permalink Peter Purich replied on
What happened to "Job loss! Job loss! Job loss!" ?? I guess someone told Justin that Taybeh isn't part of his riding.
Jewish Defense League, Friends of Simon Wiesenthal Center in Canada, SNC-Lavalin (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...), Bombardier (https://electronicintifada.net...), racism, bigotry, trample the UN charter, everything - everything - to protect your mega donators as long as they donate handsomely.
Does the Liberal Party and Conservative Party see it as a "problem", Canadians making conscientious decisions about the products they choose to consume and the parties they decide to vote? Would Justin Trudeau and Andrew Scheer prefer only lobbyists vote?
I don't think the Liberal Party really care about beer or wine, they are drinking Kool Aid and the Conservative Party are mainlining it.
Permalink Gordon Gosse replied on
Trudeau’s utter disregard for the Palestinians and his unequivocal support of the terrorist State of Israel is difficult to understand. Given the outrageous war crimes committed daily against Palestinians, are we to assume he is ignorant of the facts or totally bought by the Zionists? From his commitment to militarism, unconditional support of Ukraine despite their human rights violations, disregard for Russia’s history in the region, his support of the buildup of NATO including along Russia’s border, his meddling in the sovereignty of countries in Latin America (which may partially reflect being led around by the nose by Freeland) it appears that he has either poor judgment, is ignorant of factual information or If aware of such facts - is heartless. He is capable of turning on crocodile tears for the cameras when it comes to indigenous human rights but then pushes for the pipeline and threatens indigenous defenders of the earth with legal action and reprimand. If all this represents ignorance on his part, it reinforces my view that a great deal of the problem in international politics reflects a lack of training and education among most politicians. Politics is the one profession not requiring any training or specific educational background. The results of such ignorance when people with limited knowledge and understanding assume positions of power - are disastrous.
Add new comment