Lobby Watch 25 September 2019
A new report by Israel’s ministry of strategic affairs attempts to smear the boycott, divestment and sanctions movement as anti-Semitic.
Israel always wants to claim that all its crimes and achievements are Jewish crimes and achievements, and that therefore anyone who condemns Israel’s crimes is condemning all Jews.
But principled critics of Israel must and do insist that Israel’s crimes are not committed in the name of all Jews.
Yet two groups share an interest in erasing the distinction between Israel, on the one hand, and Jews individually and collectively, on the other.
The first group is anti-Semites who want to seize on Israel’s crimes to justify their bigotry against Jews – such people are not motivated by genuine solidarity with Palestinians.
The second group is Israel and its supporters around the world, who – by implicating Jews in Israel’s crimes – want to use Jews and genuine concern about anti-Semitism as a shield for Israel.
By crying wolf, this second group harms the struggle against real anti-Jewish bigotry, which all anti-racists must support.
In that spirit, Israel published a report on Wednesday claiming to “unmask” the BDS – boycott, divestment and sanctions – movement as inherently anti-Semitic.
At a press conference in Brussels, Israeli strategic affairs minister Gilad Erdan declared that “BDS leaders who use anti-Semitic language and images that also prove their principles, of boycotting the Jew among the nations, Israel, are anti-Semitic.”
This is an old theme that Israel is pursuing with renewed vigor.
In this article, I will respond only to claims the report makes about me and The Electronic Intifada. I may return at a later date to the rest of the 94-page document.
Distortions and lies
It is no surprise that the Israeli government’s attacks on me and this publication contain gross distortions and outright lies.
For instance, the report includes this tweet I published on 13 February:
Based on the tweet, the report claims: “Ali Abunimah accuses Israel of poisoning the Palestinians’ water supply, an accusation that dates back to the anti-Semitic blood libel of the Middle Ages in which Jews were accused of poisoning the wells of Europe and were held responsible for the Black Plague.”As anyone who reads the tweet can see, it does not accuse Israel of “poisoning the Palestinians’ water supply.”
However, the tweet is entirely accurate.
I state that Israel’s “siege and wars have made 95 percent of Gaza’s water unfit to drink.”
If anything, that was an underestimate.
My source is the United Nations, which states that 95 percent of Gaza’s water comes from a single aquifer.
“Today 97 percent of this water is unfit for human consumption based on World Health Organization (WHO) standards,” the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs stated in November 2018.
The report notes how the aquifer is depleted and contaminated due to overextraction.
“The water and sewage situation in Gaza, including the contamination of the aquifer, has been exacerbated over the past decade by a range of other factors that include damage to infrastructure during the recurrent hostilities,” OCHA states.
It also notes how Gaza’s chronic electricity crisis – a result of Israel’s siege – and Israel’s restrictions on the import of spare parts further degrade the functioning and condition of water and sewage systems.
My tweet does say that “Israel poisons Palestinians in [the] West Bank by moving unregulated chemical industries to its illegal racist colonies.”
That is true.
In my 2014 book The Battle for Justice in Palestine, I write about how Israeli companies move from within Israel to industrial zones inside settlements in the occupied West Bank, where they can evade Israeli environmental regulations.
One example I cite is the Nitzanei Shalom industrial zone built on confiscated land near the city of Tulkarem. Factories started moving there from Israel in the 1980s, following complaints about pollution in Israeli cities.
One of the factories, Geshuri Industries, makes pesticides and other chemicals. According to its CEO it moved to the occupied West Bank with the “encouragement of the government.”
In 2010, the human rights group Al-Haq produced this five-minute video summing up the toxic impact of the Geshuri factory:
In the video, local resident Imad Odeh tells Al-Haq that on days when an easterly wind blows pollution towards nearby Israeli settlements, the Geshuri factory shuts down. He says it only operates when northerly or westerly winds blow the pollution towards Palestinians.According to Al-Haq, toxic sludge from Nitzanei Shalom has been dumped onto Palestinian land while emissions from pesticide manufacturing have increased the presence of noxious gases.
The group states that known health effects of these poisons include skin disorders, liver problems, reproductive and infertility problems, immune system damage, endocrine disruption, asthma and respiratory illnesses, hypertension and other cardiovascular problems, and cancers.
These are just examples of the environmental racism and toxic pollution inherent in Israeli military occupation and exploitation of Palestinian land.
Yet Israel’s government wants people to dismiss this evidence of its crimes as akin to a Medieval blood libel.
Condemning neo-Nazis is “anti-Semitism”
The report mentions me on two other occasions. One where it takes exception to a 2017 article I published headlined, “Germany’s new Nazis see Israel as role model.”
According to the report, this article is an example of falsely presenting “Israel as a Nazi state.”
The report does not challenge a single fact in my article, which notes how leaders in Germany’s neo-Nazi party Alternative for Germany admire Israel – warm feelings that some Israeli figures are happy to reciprocate.
I view these German neo-Nazis as abhorrent. But apparently criticizing their alliance with Israeli politicians makes one an “anti-Semite” in the eyes of its government.
On the third occasion the report mentions me, it takes exception to how I have “compared Israeli soldiers to ‘ghetto guards, occupiers, snipers and other murderers of Palestinian children.’”
Who can seriously deny that Israeli soldiers are occupiers who snipe at children in what even Israeli commentators horrified by Israel’s actions have called a ghetto?
I can only speculate that this attempt to smear me – and The Electronic Intifada – is meant as retribution for how last year we published Al Jazeera’s leaked undercover documentary The Lobby–USA.
That film, which the Israel lobby tried to suppress, exposes how Erdan’s ministry of strategic affairs is engaged in a covert campaign to spy on and sabotage the lawful civil society activity of supporters of Palestinian rights in the United States.
The Israeli government may spend enormous resources trawling through social media, and it may find some expressions of anti-Semitism among activists, whether stemming from bigotry or ignorance. But these do not represent or characterize the movement.
Leaders in the Palestine solidarity movement have always been the first to condemn any expression of racism, including anti-Semitism.
They have emphasized that there is no place to blame Jews collectively for Israel’s criminal acts against Palestinians and that – despite its insistence – Israel does not represent all Jews.
Israel has no defense for its crimes, so all that is left is to try to smear an entire movement for freedom, justice and equality.
Comments
Lie and Run
Permalink tom hall replied on
Israel attacks what Israel fears. The Electronic Intifada is the most thorough, accurate and uncompromising English language news site based in the United States and dedicated to the Palestinian struggle. Its influence extends far beyond a core readership, and stories first appearing here enter the broader discourse surrounding Palestinian rights.
Israel employs its drive-by smears on precisely those targets it doesn't dare to debate as to the facts. Such is the case with the BDS (Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions) campaign, whereby no Israeli official is prepared to share the dais with a representative of the Palestinian BDS national committee (BNC). The case for Palestinian liberation is irrefutable, as is the case for war crimes tribunals against Israel. So the best the Zionists can do is lie and run, a variation on the "shoot and cry" method used during the height of their periodic atrocities.
Meanwhile, the Electronic Intifada will continue to expose these racist charlatans and their cynical allies abroad.
Need names of chemicals manufactured
Permalink Paul Merrell replied on
It would be helpful if someone could point me to a list of the chemicals produced in the Geshuri factory. This would enable proof of causation of human illnesses by pointing to scientific studies demonstrating the toxic effects of those chemicals.
chemicals
Permalink Nestor Makhno replied on
Don't they have a website. Did you google something like chemical industries israel. Maybe it is a branch or an affilliation of another chemical conglomerate based in Israel .
I did.
Permalink Paul Merrell replied on
I gave it about 10 minutes of web search. No luck finding out what chemicals.
I'd like to help. I have about 20 years' experience in fighting toxic chemicals and spent much of that time researching and writing about various toxic substance's effects.
Geshuri industries
Permalink Ruth Gould replied on
There is an abstract at http://www.odhe.cat/en/geshuri..., and if you download the PDF report linked there, it might contain information that you can use to identify the chemicals produced - or at least a starting point. The report is produced by the Observatory on Human Rights and Business North Africa and Middle East. There are epidemiological studies referenced, but as always, it's difficult to establish causation.
Thank you
Permalink Paul Merrell replied on
There is mention in the report of methylbromide and methylisocyanate. The latter was responsible for the poisoning of half a
million people and the death of 25.000 in Bhopal (India) in 1984 after a huge chemical leak from a Union Carbide manufacturing plant. The report also links to the following informative page: http://www.alhaq.org/advocacy/...
It mentions a few of the pesticides, but more alarmingly:
"Information documented by the Palestinian Environmental Quality Authority about Tulkarm has confirmed that the dumping of sludge onto the surrounding Palestinian residents’ land by the industries has led to elevated levels of furans, dioxins and PCB residue in the soil, while the spewing of emissions specifically from pesticide manufacturing, has led to elevations in noxious SOx and NOx (2015). Known health impacts of exposure to these chemicals include: skin disorders, liver problems, reproductive and infertility problems (including miscarriages, premature and still births, and low birth-weight babies), damage to the immune system, endocrine disruption, exacerbation of asthma and lung problems, chronic respiratory illnesses, hypertension and other cardiovascular problems, and cancers."
I have some expertise regarding furans, dioxins and PCB, having litigated cases involving them. They are structurally very similar and share a common toxic mechanism, aryl hydrocarbon hydroxylase. For that reason and because PCBs and furans commonly degrade to the most toxic synthetic substance known to man, TCDD, or 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin, EPA regulates these chemicals together, assigning potency factors to the less toxic ones as a percentage of TCDD's toxicity.
A no-effect dose for TCDD has never been demonstrated in test animals. EPA's consistent position has been that all TCDD found in the environment must be cleaned up, with no remaining residues at the limits of detection.
TCDD gained fame as an unavoidable contaminant of Agent Orange.
Words
Permalink Richard Baldwin Cook replied on
Zionists' incessant denigration of critics of Israel as anti-semites is a message directed at other zionists & at no one else. This is their way to remind each other of the one and only stratigem they must and do deploy tirelessly - ignore all facts and repeatedly mount personal attack grounded in accusations of anti-Semitism.
This rhetorical ploy effectively deflects the target of Zionist criticism away from actually organizing real political opposition to Zionism. The above response article exemplifies this synergy. Words, words, words.
Use of the IHRA
Permalink Tony Greenstein replied on
The allegations of 'antisemitism' against Ali use one of the 11 illustrations of 'antisemitism' in the IHRA definition viz. 'Using the symbols and images associated with classic antisemitism (e.g., claims of Jews killing Jesus or blood libel) to characterize Israel or Israelis'
Jews were accused of poisoning wells in medieval therefore any accusation of Israel poisoning Palestinians ipso facto becomes the old anti-Semitic accusation! A clever sleight of hand except of course that Israel is not medieval Jewry.
It is a fact that Israel has resorted to using poisons - whether chemical warfare or indeed poisoning water supplies in the 1948 war/Naqba. It is also a fact that Abba Kovner, the MAPAM poet/fighter when in Europe with associates attempted to poison a whole Germany city's water supplies as revenge for the Holocaust. Since they admitted doing so one wonders whether mentioning this too is antisemitic?
The transference of the situation of medieval Jewry under feudalism to modern capitalism and imperialism when poisoning one's enemy or the indigenous population is a fact (e.g. the use of depleted Uranium in Iraq) is an example of Zionist duplicity.