In Israel, racism is the winning ballot

Haneen Zoabi was a lightning rod for incitement during the elections campaign.

Yotam Ronen ActiveStills

The elections for the twentieth Israeli Knesset, or parliament, were not lacking in drama: there were media ploys, political realignments and several surprises as the right-wing Likud party, contrary to many expectations, defeated the Zionist Union, considered to be a center-left party in Israel.

The elections also saw an unprecedented level of racist incitement against Palestinian Arab citizens of Israel, a fifth of the population, which played a critical part in the election’s events and results. This series of threats, intimidations and attempts to delegitimize Arab citizens and their political participation, which occurred throughout the process, did not end until the polls closed on 17 March.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu announced the latest election after the dissolution of the nineteenth Israeli Knesset in December 2014. During that government’s term (2013-14), the Knesset amended the Election Law, which raised the threshold required to enter the parliament from two percent to 3.25 percent.

The goal behind this new law was to substantially weaken or exclude the three main Arab political parties, which ran separately for the Knesset, with each attaining three to four seats. In response to the new law, the Arab parties decided to run together as a single slate — called the Joint List — despite their political and ideological differences.

Adalah and the Association for Civil Rights in Israel argued, as part of a petition to the Israeli high court, that the amended Election Law discriminated against the Arab parties, as the new threshold was forced upon them, and argued that the law reflected the imposition of the political will of the Israeli Jewish majority in the Knesset against the political participation rights of the Arab minority. However, the court, in an eight-to-one vote, rejected the petition and upheld the law; the sole Arab justice was the only dissenting vote.


Following the unity of the Arab parties, the Joint List launched its platform to combat the racism in Israel. In a debate on Israel’s TV Channel 2, Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman (Yisrael Beiteinu party) stated: “There is no difference between the Communists, the Islamists and the Nasserists. What unites them is hatred of the State of Israel, and they represent the terrorist organizations in the Knesset.”

Lieberman tried to portray the list’s unity as a conspiracy, yet he forgot to mention that he was in fact a key sponsor for raising the electoral threshold that pushed the Arab parties to unite in order to overcome it.

Lieberman’s views were not just a passing statement. Even before the announcement of the Joint List’s candidacy, the right-wing parties in the Knesset expressed their intention to disqualify it from running in the elections. A few hours after the Joint List officially submitted its candidates, Likud and Yisrael Beiteinu filed motions for disqualification against the Joint List and against MK Haneen Zoabi (Tajammu/Balad party) to the Central Elections Committee (CEC).

The CEC’s hearings on the disqualification motions devolved into a hysteria of racist attacks and humiliation against the Arab representatives, including statements by many Israeli politicians and officials present that repeatedly interrupted MK Zoabi’s speech in her defense against the motions.

The politicians called MK Zoabi a terrorist and said that “her hands are stained with blood,” and made chauvinistic insults against her including remarks about her clothing. The peak of these racist attacks occurred when, after MK Zoabi recited a quotation in Arabic, a Likud party member yelled: “I am scared that you are going to say ‘Allahu Akbar’ and blow yourself up!” The CEC approved her disqualification with 27 votes to 6, and Adalah represented MK Zoabi before the high court. The court canceled the disqualification in an 8-1 ruling on 18 February.

The series of racist incitement did not end here. In the run-up to the elections, Lieberman launched a public campaign entitled “Haneen to Jenin,” calling for the expulsion of MK Zoabi to Jenin, a city in the occupied West Bank, and the revocation of her Israeli citizenship.

Lieberman launched a parallel campaign slogan entitled “Ariel to Israel, Umm al-Fahm to Palestine,” promoting the official annexation of West Bank settlements (like Ariel) while calling for the population transfer Arab citizens living in the Triangle area, including Umm al-Fahm (population: 52,000), the third-largest Arab town in Israel. During a debate on TV Channel 2, the head of the Joint List, Ayman Odeh, stated, “We Arabs in Israel are twenty percent of the state’s citizens,” to which Lieberman responded, “For now.”

The extreme right-wing politician Baruch Marzel (Yahad party) also based his campaign on personal incitement against MK Zoabi, with the slogan, “Wipe the smile off her face.”

Right-wing activists on the ground were quick to answer the call. On 3 March, at a forum on women’s political participation at an academic center in Ramat Gan, right-wing activists attacked MK Zoabi by throwing liquid all over her. Worse yet, after they came out of the forum, Emily Muwati, a consultant for MK Zoabi, was attacked by activists with a metal rod and received injuries to her head that required her hospitalization. Baruch Marzel later wrote on his Facebook page: “We promised, we fulfilled, we will continue …”


Although Lieberman’s remarks against Arab citizens were the most extreme — such as his statement that “Those who are against us, there is nothing to be done — we need to pick up an axe and cut off his head” — other Israeli parties and political candidates also expressed racist attitudes.

Economy Minister Naftali Bennett (Habayet Hayehudi, or Jewish Home party) stated during a speech: “People who drive to the Negev [home to 200,000 Arab Bedouin citizens of Israel] know that they cannot park their cars near popular tourist sites, because they will get broken into … in Petah Tikva too, and in the Galilee [the northern area which is more than 50 percent Arab],” implying that Arab citizens would steal their cars.

Moshe Kahlon, head of the Kulanu party and a former Likud Minister of Communications, despite campaigning primarily on a platform of social and economic issues, said that he “would not sit on a government that relied on the Arabs.”

Even the center Zionist Union, led by Isaac Herzog, head of the Labor Party, also displayed racist views. In response to accusations that Herzog was not a strong enough leader, the party released a video interview of his comrades during his military service, in which one of them commented “Herzog understands the Arab mentality … including through the crosshairs [of a sniper rifle].”

Thus, over the long weeks before the elections, campaigns of incitement against the Arab citizens became a fundamental pillar for political popularity in Israel. The “Arab voter” became a part of the series of threats used by Israeli Jewish parties to scare citizens, including with a nuclear-armed Iran, Hamas-made tunnels, and Hizballah rockets.


In the midst of this racist atmosphere came election day. Sagi Kaisler, the director of the Samaria Residents’ Committee, which represents the settlement outposts in the occupied West Bank, organized 1,500 settlers to participate as volunteers at voting stations in Arab towns and villages.

Kaisler said: “Wherever there are Arab villages, there is fraud. This is the way they work. They do this in their local elections, they are not doing this against the state, it is in their nature … the Joint List united in order to pass the electoral threshold, but primarily because they are evil parties that want to overthrow the rightwing government … We are in a battle for the future of our state, against Arabs, against Europeans and against some American forces.”

To protect the settlers, an armed group carrying live ammunition, tear gas, sticks and other weapons accompanied the volunteers to the voting stations. According to reports from TV Channel 2, these activities were conducted under the direct orders of Likud MK Yariv Levin, who is currently a leading candidate for the position of the minister of justice.

Finally, while these settler-militants were roaming Arab towns and villages on election day, Netanyahu, fearing that he was slipping in the elections polls, concluded the long trail of racist incitement by releasing a video message on his Facebook page stating that “The right-wing government is in danger. The Arabs are going to the polls in droves. Left-wing NGOs [nongovernmental organizations] are bringing them on buses.” Judging from Likud’s victory, these messages appeared to be successful.

The elections for the twentieth Knesset developed a new political representation for Palestinian Arab citizens — the Joint List — to challenge the Israeli political scene from Lieberman to Herzog. The prime minister, meanwhile, does not appear interested in abandoning his winning ticket: incitement against Arab citizens. Regardless of the debates that will unfold in the follow-up to this election, it is clear that racism was the most victorious ballot.

Adalah is a human rights organization and legal center working to promote and defend the rights of Palestinian Arab citizens of Israel.




I am wondering if there is an opening with stalwarts within the mainstream Jewish community in this country. Diane Feinstein certainly has damaged her credentials she earned for leading San Francisco during its time of crisis by saddling up to the surveillance state. However, recently she has shown some push back on this issue, of course only when it impinged on her prerogative, when it became public knowledge that the Senate committee on intelligence itself, was being surveilled itself. I saw one brief interview with Feinstein during the Netanyahu visit in which she was pretty agitated about Netanyahu not representing her as a Jew. This attitude contrasts with Obama's retrained attitude on the high jacking of at least, what is left of the semblance of democracy in our country-I saw no more discussion of Feinstein in the media.
Back hear in Appalachia (WVa.) our national representatives and state legislatures have shifted from a democrat-labor constituency over to an ALEC controlled clamp down on democracy. In neighboring Kentucky, thanks to the inner city African American community in Louisville, this transformation was not been completely solidified. (Democrats control the executive and one house of the legislature). Congressman John Yarmouth, a Jewish American representing Louisville, also declined to attend the Netanyahu speach-he also is pretty unenthusiastic about mountain top removal, perhaps the worst form of resource extraction practiced south of the Alberta Tars Sands. I realize there are serious limitations to such configurations as J. Street, but is one possible outcome to the Israeli establishment putting their cards on the table in the form of putting to rest the canard of Israel as an oasis of democracy, a larger shift in Jewish-American public opinion back to its more progressive roots before the advent of the "special relationship?"