Rights and Accountability 22 April 2017
Hundreds of Palestinian prisoners entered day six of their hunger strike on Saturday, while Israeli authorities ratcheted up their punitive measures in an attempt to weaken the collective action.
On 17 April, 1,500 Palestinians launched a mass hunger strike with a long list of demands, including improved medical care and conditions and more family visits.
While several men on strike have already been hospitalized, Israeli leaders are refusing to negotiate with the prisoners’ demands.
“When it comes to the hunger strike by terrorists in Israeli jails, I take the approach of Margaret Thatcher,” Israeli defense minister Avigdor Lieberman wrote on Facebook, in reference to the former British prime minister who notoriously allowed Irish hunger strikers to die in prison in 1981.
Israel currently holds more than 6,000 Palestinian political prisoners. Hundreds are detained without any charge or trial, and thousands after trials in Israel’s military courts which have a nearly 100 percent conviction rate.
Targeting leaders of the strike, Israeli authorities began confiscating personal belongings and clothes, banning television, forcibly relocating strikers to different sections of prisons and placing dozens in solitary confinement.
“In Nitzan and Ramla prisons, Israeli officials used police dogs on hunger-striking Palestinian detainees and seized the Quran from prisoners,” the Ma’an News Agency reported on Saturday, citing the Palestinian Prisoners’ Society.
Retaliation for New York Times article
Among those placed in solitary confinement are Marwan Barghouti, who initiated the mass hunger strike, and Karim Younes, the Palestinian who has reportedly served the longest uninterrupted sentence in an Israeli prison.
Barghouti, a prominent figure in Palestinian Authority leader Mahmoud Abbas’ Fatah movement, may be further punished for his op-ed published in The New York Times on 16 April explaining the reasons for the strike.
The Palestinian Committee for Prisoners’ Affairs cited claims by Israel that Barghouti’s wife “smuggled” the article out of prison.
But Israeli public security minister Gilad Erdan said authorities are investigating whether it was his lawyers.
Erdan added that if it is discovered that his lawyers did help Barghouti publish the article, they may be banned from visiting him.
Michael Oren, Israel’s former US ambassador who now works for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, suggested the The New York Times may have played a role.
“If someone in the paper helped him [smuggle the article out of prison], The New York Times should be held accountable,” Oren said, suggesting that the paper’s Jerusalem bureau could be closed.
Ma’an News Agency reported that lawyers have already been banned from visiting Ashkelon prison and access to other prisons has been inconsistent.
The Palestinian Authority’s prisoners’ committee said on Wednesday that Israel’s ministry of justice has confirmed that it would be illegal to prohibit all hunger strikers from seeing their lawyers.
Lawyers representing striking prisoners are now boycotting Israeli military courts.
Taunting hunger strikers
Public security minister Erdan, like Lieberman, has vowed to ignore the hunger strikers’ demands.
“There is no real justification for this strike,” Erdan said. “Terrorists aren’t in prison to get good conditions. They’re there to be punished. A hunger strike shouldn’t change our behavior as the state toward the prisoners.”
Erdan spearheaded legislation to legalize force-feeding of Palestinian hunger strikers in 2015, when he likened hunger strikes to suicide bombs.
On Thursday, Israelis fired up a barbecue in the parking lot of Ofer prison, where Palestinians inside had refused food for several days, to “celebrate the hunger strike.”The people behind the barbecue are affiliated with the far-right Jewish Home party, a member of Netanyahu’s coalition government.
Several dozen detainees reportedly resumed eating after five days on strike, but have been replaced by hundreds more joining the protest.
- hunger strike
- Marwan Barghouthi
- Gilad Erdan
- Avigdor Lieberman
- Irish hunger strikers
- Margaret Thatcher
- Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine
- Palestinian prisoners
- Jewish Home
the strike is necessary
Permalink tom hall replied on
The strikers deserve our full backing. Conditions are now so bad inside the Israeli prisons that no other remedy is available. And all of Palestine is a prison.
Threats to close the New York Times bureau in Jerusalem are preposterous. Such an act would needlessly antagonize a vital source of support for Israel and produce a sharp drop among U.S. liberals willing to go on defending the Zionist state .
They'll punish the Marghouti family and his lawyers. They wouldn't dare shut down the Times, particularly now when BDS gains are so evident. Despite slight indications of a shift in editorial policy, the New York Times continues to hold the line against Palestinian rights. If the Israelis choose to attack their greatest ideological benefactor, they'll pay a very big price. You don't monkey with the Grey Lady.
'On Thursday, Israelis fired
Permalink Rev. F. Mark Mealing Ph.D. replied on
'On Thursday, Israelis fired up a barbecue in the parking lot of Ofer prison, where Palestinians inside had refused food for several days, to “celebrate the hunger strike."'
How richly humane, taunting prisoners. The spirit of the Nazi concentration camps lives on! & in the last place in the world where that should be possible....