Democrats try to bury Palestine in middle of the night

Rania Khalek Power Suits 27 June 2016

In the early morning hours of 25 June, while many Americans were asleep, Hillary Clinton allies on the Democratic Party’s platform drafting committee blocked a motion that called for an end to Israel’s military occupation and illegal settlement enterprise.

The vote came after several grueling hours of bickering between members named to the committee by Clinton and Democratic National Committee chairwoman, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, on the one hand, and those appointed by Senator Bernie Sanders, on the other.

The video above shows highlights of the heated exchanges surrounding the vote.

Deeper struggles over Israel taking place within the party have been brought into the open since Sanders named prominent supporters of Palestinian rights to the committee that is writing the party’s general election platform.

Clinton, who appears likely to clinch the party’s presidential nomination after a hard-fought primary battle with Sanders, named members who back her staunch pro-Israel line.

Dark of night

Throughout the day, Clinton surrogates shot down motions endorsing universal health care, a carbon tax, stronger support for raising the minimum wage, forceful opposition to the Trans-Pacific Partnership trade deal and a moratorium on fracking.

While these defeats took place during the day, committee organizers waited until the dead of night to deliberate on issues related to Israel’s violations of Palestinian rights.

The vote appeared to be deliberately timed to garner as little attention as possible.

It was the very last section raised and by then it was nearly 1am. Ironically, holding votes in the middle of the night has been a Republican tactic for passing right-wing measures with as little public scrutiny as possible.

But if the purpose in this case was to suppress public debate over Israel, it doesn’t seem to be working.

End the occupation

Arab American Institute president James Zogby, a Sanders appointee, introduced an amendment to revise the language in the Israel/Palestine section of the platform.

Zogby proposed deleting a drafted pledge to oppose so-called delegitimization of Israel at the United Nations or by the Palestinian-led boycott, divestment and sanctions (BDS) movement.

He also proposed removing a reference to Jerusalem as Israel’s “undivided” capital.

Zogby pushed for wording that called for “an end to occupation and illegal settlements so that [Palestinians] may live in independence, sovereignty and dignity,” “an international effort to rebuild Gaza which the UN warns could be uninhabitable by 2020” and recognition that Palestinians, like Israelis, “deserve security, recognition and a normal life free from violence, terror and incitement.”

Sanders “had direct input” in crafting the amendment, Zogby said, arguing, “the term occupation shouldn’t be controversial.”

Indeed, there was nothing radical about the amendment, which left the pledged US commitment to subsidizing Israel’s military machine and the reference to Israel as a “Jewish and democratic state” intact.

Even the supposedly liberal pro-Israel lobby group J Street did not object to the word occupation. Although the memo it circulated to members of the platform committee urged them to adopt language opposing BDS.

Champions of occupation

Clinton appointee Wendy Sherman, a lobbyist who effectively sells access to government officials, accused BDS and the UN of “creat[ing] anti-Semitism.”

Former congressman turned lobbyist Howard Berman framed opposition to Israel’s occupation as “one-sided” and suggested that Palestinians bear some responsibility for Israel’s illegal conduct.

Bonnie Schaefer, former joint-CEO of the jewelry chain Claire’s Stores, didn’t even bother addressing the issues raised in the amendment. Instead, she engaged in pinkwashing.

“As a gay Jewish Zionist, Israel is the only democracy in the Middle East, as we all know, the only place in the Middle East that I can walk down the street with my wife hand in hand and not be afraid,” Schaefer said.

A Clinton supporter and major donor to the Democratic Party, Schaefer was named to the committee by the DNC.

“Tell the truth”

Zogby fired back, while “you can go and walk down the street of Tel Aviv holding the hand of your wife, I can’t get in the airport without seven hours of harassment because I’m of Arab descent.”

“We have to be able to call it what it is. It’s an occupation that humiliates people, that breeds contempt, that breeds anger and despair and hopelessness, that leads to violence,” Zogby added.

Civil rights activist and celebrated public intellectual Cornel West, an outspoken supporter of BDS appointed by Sanders, expressed outrage.

“When the IDF [Israeli army] kills innocent people, over 500 babies in 51 days, no matter how many shields they say Hamas uses, it’s wrong,” said West, referring to Israel’s summer 2014 attack on Gaza.

The “Democratic Party must tell the truth,” West implored. “We can never fully respect the Palestinians unless we can name … the boot on their necks.”

“I come from a people who’ve been hated,” West added, drawing an analogy between the long history of denying the horrors inflicted on African Americans and the refusal to recognize the oppression of Palestinians.

The motion was nonetheless defeated in an 8-5 vote, with Sanders’ representatives being the only committee members to back it.

That vote, combined with other defeats throughout the day, prompted West to abstain from approving the platform altogether.

“[If] we can’t say a word about [Trans-Pacific Partnership], if we can’t talk about Medicare for all explicitly, if the greatest prophetic voice dealing with impending ecological catastrophe can hardly win a vote and if we can’t even acknowledge occupation as something that’s real in the lives of a slice of humanity … it just seems to me there’s no way in good conscience I can say take it to the next stage,” West said.

“I have to abstain. I have no other moral option, it would be a violation of my own limited sense of moral integrity and spiritual conscience,” he added. “That’s how I roll.”

West’s and Zogby’s advocacy for Palestinian rights has been so insistent that the Clinton wing of the party has attempted to neutralize them through the most cynical form of identity politicking.

“Concerned that Zogby and West’s viewpoint may be gaining traction at least in the public narrative, Bakari Sellers, a former South Carolina representative and now a CNN commentator, sent a letter signed by 60 African American politicians around the country to the co-chairs of the platform committee last week urging them to stick to the traditional language on Israel,” CNN reported.

This move was meant as a “counterpoint to West, a prominent member of the Black community.”

Fundamental disconnect

“Even though ending Israeli military occupation and settlement building have been explicit US policy goals since the early days of the George W. Bush administration, and even though Hillary Clinton as President Obama’s Secretary of State tried to advance these goals, Clinton appointees to the Democratic National Committee’s platform drafting committee outvoted Sanders appointees to exclude these very same goals from the Democratic platform,” Josh Ruebner, policy director of the US Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation, told The Electronic Intifada.

“As Dr. Jim Zogby, a Sanders appointee, noted in the debate last night there is a fundamental disconnect between official US policy and the unwillingness of the Democratic Party to back it,” Ruebner added.

The US Campaign is calling on activists to urge both the Republican and Democratic parties to support Palestinian rights in their platforms.

Tags

Comments

picture

Peter Loeb replied on

PS

As "Platform Committees" are essentially meaningless (see my
other comment), advocacy energies should instead be placed
on Members of Congress (the Congressional Committees,
their constituents). This is a long process.

While this advocate is impressed by statements to the Platform
Committee of the Democratic Convention of 2016, such expressions
will have no effect on the appropriations of mass amounts of
money for armaments which will go to Israel. s Noam Chomsky
has eloquently pointed out on the4 first page of THE FATEFUL
TRIANGLE, it is hypocrisy to blame only Israel when the US
continues to make vast sums for military purposes available
to Israel (etc.)

---Peter Loeb, Boston, MA, USA

picture

Marko replied on

During the Israel/Palestine hearing , West , Zogby , and McKibben represented the Bernie campaign with the dignity and authenticity that's possible only when you're on the right side of an issue. It made me proud to be a Bernie Bro.

I wish Bernie would recognize that the DLC and the Democratic Party are beyond redemption , and move on. Actually , I think he does recognize this - what he needs to do is acknowledge it publicly , explain how he did his best to act within its structure to facilitate the changes we need but , having failed , is moving over to the Green Party for an independent run with Jill Stein.

It's not enough to say "we'll get'em in '18 and '20". Who's going to pay any attention then , what with all the wars HRC will have us fighting by then ?

This is a unique moment , so don't waste it. Recent events in the UK might be instructive. I think Corbyn may have hidden his true feelings about Brexit in order to maintain the appearance that he was working within "the system". Instead , he should have campaigned forcefully for "Leave" , explaining carefully that you could be pro-immigrant and anti-EU at the same time , and that "the system" was the very problem , for immigrants and natives alike , and that it needed radical change that would only be possible outside the EU. Had Corbyn done this , he might now have the inside track to PM. Instead , he's been weakened dramatically.

Bernie can still pull this thing off. Winning the presidency as a Green would be a small miracle , true enough , but Bernie's already proven that miracles are his stock in trade.

Go for it , Bernie. Please.

( PS : Thanks for posting that video , Rania. It made my day. )

picture

Sage replied on

There is no doubt about it, Clinton is pro occupation and illegal settlements. She knows fully well what Israel's crimes are, in fact the US State Department has condemned illegal settlements, and yet her hunger to be President has made her put any concern for the Palestinians aside, so that she can please her wealthy Jewish pro Israeli donors. Clinton has thrown the Palestinians under the bus at this stage of the game, imagine how things would be when she is in the White House and Netanyahu will have a great influence in our policies. It is frightening.

picture

Alfredo replied on

The posture adopted by the DNC and Clinton surrogates is an insult to human rights and spits on the face of those who see the illegal and immoral abuses committed against the Palestinians and other minority groups within Israel. There is no way that this travesty of platform is going to attract those who support Bernie Sanders' vision of a long overdue political revolution. Shame on each and every democrat who stock to Clinton's hypocritical double talk about Israel and the Palestinians. History won't be kind to those who chose politics over morality.

picture

Peter Loeb replied on

While thanking Rania Khalek for an excellent summary of events in her article,
we must always remind ourselves that convention "Platform Committees"
are essentially meaningless, If they ever have any real significance at
all, it is only to underline the presumptive candidate's established views.
Such committees also disingenuously provide for n outlet for the
expression of minority opinions.

Platform Committees are not binding either on a campaign, a
party candidate, or on future governmental policies.

Remember that in 1932, FDR ran on a platform of a
"balance budget" against Herbert Hoover.

----Peter Loeb, Boston, MA, USA

picture

Yesh Prabhu replied on

This video helped me to decide what I must do in November: I must not vote for Hillary Clinton. She does not deserve to be our President. Does a politician who is afraid to tell the truth that Israel is occupying Palestine, and is afraid to utter the word "occupation", deserve my vote? The answer is clearly and resoundingly, no. What a shame. I am quite sure that there are tens of thousands of Democrat voters who feel the way I do; and their votes matter. I am sure that she will regret her decision to white wash and gloss over Israel's oppression of Palestinians, and her turning blind eye towards Israel's sprawling and illegal settlements in occupied Palestine. It will come to haunt her.
Yesh Prabhu, Bushkill, Pennsylvania

Rania Khalek

Rania Khalek's picture

Rania Khalek is an independent journalist reporting on the underclass and marginalized.