Media Watch 6 October 2011
Last night I took a flight with easyJet and almost vomited when I saw a feature about Tel Aviv in the airline’s magazine Traveller. “Liberal and hedonistic, Tel Aviv has ambitions to be the world’s gayest destination,” I was told.
Stretched out over six pages, the piece was replete with propaganda. The Tel Aviv municipality was praised for funding a gay community centre, annual Gay Pride events and a gay film festival. This puts the city “streets ahead of London”, moist-eyed journalist Jamie Hakin wrote, as it “turns out Tel Aviv doesn’t simply tolerate its gay scene and associated tourism, it actively courts it.”
I carefully read the piece but did not see the word “Palestinian” appear even once. The only attempt to deal with the politics of the region was via a quote from the Israeli movie director Eytan Fox: “There are some people who claim the [Israeli] government is using the gay community a little like a fig leaf, to say, ‘Look how accepting of minorities we are.’ But as a guy who has been working most of his life to promote gay issues through my films, we can’t avoid the fact that, thanks to a lot of people, Israel has changed in ways that are amazing. It used to be a very macho culture that could never accept gay people.”
“Pinkwashing” apartheid is among the activities undertaken as part of the Brand Israel initiative sponsored by the country’s foreign ministry. As part of this public relations blitz, the Israeli government has financed events like “Out in Israel” – held in San Francisco last year – which promote the country as a haven for homosexuals. This capitalizes on the work of Zionist groups like StandWithUs, which has produced flyers bragging how “Israel has no laws against sodomy, and its constitution guarantees equal rights.”
Like most propaganda, this is dishonest. For a start, Israel does not have a written constitution and its quasi-constitutional laws do not guarantee equal rights; they facilitate systematic discrimination against the Palestinians who comprise one-fifth of Israel’s population. Furthermore, the idea that Israel has banished homophobia is not supported by empirical evidence. A recent survey of gay members of the Israeli military found that 40 percent of respondents suffered verbal abuse and 20 percent sexual or physical violence.
Why is easyJet enabling Israeli propaganda? For commercial reasons, of course. The budget airline has been pushing for a new agreement to liberalize aviation between the European Union and Israel. By opening up the market to greater cooperation, easyJet should be able to fly from Tel Aviv to more European cities than it does at the moment, Hugh Aitken, a representative of the firm, has said, according to the Israeli business publication The Marker.
Protest at obscenity
Many gay rights activists have opposed Brand Israeli, it should be emphasized. In 2009, the Toronto-based group Queers Against Israeli Apartheid issued a statement against leisure tourism in Tel Aviv. The following year, an Israeli float was prevented from taking part in Madrid’s Gay Pride parade to register the organisers’ outrage at the murderous attack on the Gaza Freedom Flotilla.
It is obscene for easyJet to be selling Tel Aviv as a gay paradise, when Israel denies elementary rights to gay and straight Palestinians alike. The current issue of Traveller gives an email address — carolyn@easyJet.com — for contacting Carolyn McCall, the firm’s chief executive. Please write to her and complain about how easyJet is sugar-coating apartheid.
- gay rights
- Tel Aviv
- Queers Against Israeli Apartheid
- Brand Israel
- European Union
I emailed the woman from
Permalink Joseph replied on
I emailed the woman from EasyJet, hopefully it helps. I told her I have flown with EasyJet in the past, from Belfast to London, but I will be reluctant to do so again. I also mentioned that maybe next time I will take my business to RyanAir. Thanks for highlighting this issue David.
EasyJet's offensive piece
Permalink Mark Pickard replied on
Amazing, David...I was on an EasyJet flight myself on Saturday, and saw that disgusting abomination myself! I kept the mag, intending to send it to various Palestinian solidarity orgs (including Electronic Intifada) for a response, and hoping specifically that responses might be forthcoming from Gay Rights groups in particular. Is there a depth to which the Israeli 'hasbara machine' would not plumb?...probably not! I 'googled' "Jamie Hakin journalist", but it pulled up nothing. I wonder if he too is just a creation of the same! Thanks a million your superb response, David.
Permalink emwatcher replied on
Jamie Hakin is described as "Former 3Sixty editor/co owner and volunteer Pride press officer Jamie Hakin" at the following site found by Google:
That doesn't mean he isn't deep into hasbara, of course.
McCall and Easyjet
Permalink mary replied on
A pushy type.
The article is about gay life
Permalink Mattttttt replied on
The article is about gay life in Tel Aviv, not about the occupation. Are you unable to see that this is a different subject? I'm against the occupation myself but this simply isn't about the occupation. Israel treats gay people well, it treats Palestinian people badly. These are different subjects. There's nothing wrong with writing about the former without mentioning the latter. Few articles about the occupation mention progressive attitudes to homosexuality in Tel Aviv, after all.
It isn't propaganda. It's an article about gay life in Tel Aviv. Calm down, people.