A Gantz-led government will keep alive the peace process charade

A group of people are waiting in a hallway

Palestinian voters wait to cast their ballots in a polling station in Jaffa. In spite of incitement directed at them, not least by Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu, Palestinian citizens of Israel turned out in numbers to make the Joint List the third largest political party in Israel.

Heidi Levine Sipa Press

With almost all votes counted at the time of writing, Israel is facing another hung parliament.

This could lead to a third election in a year. Or we could see the advent of a grand coalition of three secular parties.

Whether such a government would include Likud’s Benjamin Netanyahu, the incumbent four-time prime minister, is not clear.

For some 6.7 million Jewish Israelis, the possibility that far too many years of Netanyahu rule may come to an ignoble end with charges brought for corruption is significant.

The prospect that extremist religious parties will not be part of the government for the first time in years is also significant.

That is also important, if less so, to 1.6 million Palestinian citizens of Israel, upon whom Netanyahu had poured all his derisory bigotry during an ill-tempered reelection campaign.

But nothing is clear yet. Netanyahu, ever the survivor, may entice Yisrael Beiteinu’s Avigdor Lieberman, ever the opportunist, into another right-wing coalition.

Or Blue-White’s Benny Gantz, the former chief of staff who oversaw Israel’s hi-tech slaughter in Gaza in 2014, might form a coalition without Likud. Or, indeed, without Lieberman.

For now, the balance of probabilities suggests Gantz will lead any new government. But there are plenty of possibilities in the current deadlock and only one certainty: Israel’s typically confused election result will mean practically nothing for some 5 million Palestinians in the occupied West Bank and Gaza Strip who cannot vote but are also ruled by whatever government eventually emerges.

More of the same

Netanyahu had promised to annex large swathes of occupied territory if he formed the next government.

None of the other main parties have made such promises, which might suggest that they would be more amenable to reviving a peace process – long comatose – with the Palestinian Authority.

That, however, is not the case. If Netanyahu had promised to turn off the life support, Gantz and his ilk are merely prepared to keep the power flowing.

The Blue-White alliance is run by three former generals – in addition to Gantz, they are Gabi Ashkenazi and Moshe Yaalon – and a journalist, Yair Lapid.

None of them will make the territorial concessions that any kind of workable two-state solution demands.

None of them will pull a single settler from occupied territory, thereby reversing a war crime the military men among them were instrumental in creating.

And none of them will accept to divide Jerusalem or even walk back on the Golan annexation now that it has US presidential approval.

There will, in other words, be absolutely no change when it comes to the political situation with the Palestinians or the wider region.

All a Blue-White-led government means is that donor countries, who have paid so much to help Israel maintain its occupation for so long, will now find a reason to prolong that charade for a couple more years.

Netanyahu’s promise to annex more territory was of course morally abhorrent. It would have amounted to a naked land grab. But at least it was honest. And it would have left those who claim there is still a possibility for a negotiated two-state solution – that is somehow just to Palestinians, that could somehow result in a viable, free and sovereign Palestinian state – nowhere to hide.

Unfortunately, a Gantz-led government will provide them all a figleaf for a while longer.

A sliver of good news

The biggest story out of the election so far is the success of the Joint List, a coalition of parties led by and catering to Israel’s Palestinian citizens.

Famously fractured, these political parties long failed to stir the passions of a deeply despondent demographic.

Their despondency was a natural consequence of decades of oppression. Palestinians in Israel spent nearly 20 years under military rule before being “allowed” the vote. They are institutionally discriminated against by a state that explicitly excludes them by defining itself as one in which the right to self-determination is restricted to Jews.

They are second-class citizens who are constantly demonized as a fifth column. In this most recent election campaign, Netanyahu called them people who “glorify bloodthirsty terrorists” and “want to destroy us.”

Nevertheless, they are a growing force. And to its credit, the Joint List succeeded not only to unite the vote but galvanize it. Palestinian voter turnout was at 60 percent, up a massive 10 percent from the April vote. That made the Joint List the third-largest political party in Israel.

Delightfully, much of the impetus for the Palestinian turnout seems to have been the very racism meant to intimidate them to stay away.

The Joint List will not be invited – nor would it want to be – into any coalition government. But depending on the makeup of any new government, the Joint List may well have a crucial role to play in parliament, a significant bloc of votes to be courted.

That, at least, is a portent of potential positive change, some counterweight to the outright racism of much of Israel’s polity.




The Joint List exists because of the incomplete ethnic cleansing of 1948. It was about 80% fulfilled. Thus, the 20% Arab population of Israel. The 60% turnout is heartening and the courage of the Palestinians is remarkable. The List may be able to make some difference in parliament; but be in no doubt, if they make too much difference, the law will be changed to stop them.
What we have just seen is truly the society of the spectacle. The world is shown images and presented with reports from Israel which suggest a functioning democracy. This should worry all of us. Here is a State which defines itself as a theocracy or an ethnocracy or a bit of both, which denies the vote to 5 million people it rules over, and which coveys the sense that it is a democracy. It is no more democratic than apartheid South Africa. Israel can't be democratic. A democracy must provide equality before the law to all citizens, regardless of religion, ethnicity, sexual orientation or any other difference. Israel imposes a distinction between Jew and Arab which is 100% cultural. It is the doctrine of Zionism. It is a distinction which has no validity outside the distorted view of reality on which Zionism rests.
Israeli commentators have been heard over the last few days claiming Israel is a Jewish State and a democratic State. Impossible. A democratic State can't discriminate against its citizens on religious or ethnic grounds. There are 5 million uncast votes. There are 5 million unheard voices. This is not democracy, it's a game show, it's a fraud, it's a hoax, it's a scam.
From the beginning, the problem for the "settlers" was the indigenous population. It remains the problem. The goal of a pure Jewish State always was a fantasy. It could have been achieved only through genocide. It can't now be achieved as the eyes of the world are on Israel. Sooner or later they will have to accept the game is up. One Palestine, one State, democracy. There is no other answer.


no, only israeli citizens get to vote, and not absentee either. but 'palestine' president abbas is currently in the 15th year of his four year term----HE is the one preventing the arabs of that area to vote for their leadership....


Er, what was the topic again? What you wrote there about Abbas may be true but it's really not relevant here I think. I call "whataboutery" here.

I do find it amazing, remarkable & is the word ironic maybe that the future of Israel's govt & whether Netanyahu's malign rule continues or ends depends on the Arab parties. I guess maybe I shouldn't feel that way & it actually makes a lot of sense but wow.

Omar Karmi

Omar Karmi is an independent journalist and former Jerusalem and Washington, DC, correspondent for The National newspaper.