Power Suits 25 October 2018
Jordan announced on Sunday that it will not renew annexes in its 1994 peace treaty with Israel that gave Israel continued control of the Jordanian territories of al-Baqoura and al-Ghamr.
The so-called Wadi Araba agreement normalized relations between the two countries, despite there being no restoration of Palestinian rights or an end to Israeli military occupation of the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, and the Gaza Strip.
Al-Baqoura, an area in northwest Jordan where the Yarmouk and Jordan rivers meet, and al-Ghamr, an area south of the Dead Sea, were leased to Israel for 25 years.
The two areas, amounting to just a few square miles, are farmed or used by Israelis.
The treaty recognized however that the areas would remain “under Jordan’s sovereignty with Israeli private land ownership rights and property interests.”
The lease ends in October 2019 and under the terms of the treaty would renew automatically “unless one year prior notice of termination is given by either party, in which case, at the request of either party, consultations shall be entered into.”
Met with resistance
King Abdullah of Jordan announced the decision on Twitter.
“Al-Baqoura and al-Ghamr have always been our top priority,” he tweeted.“Our decision to terminate the al-Baqoura and al-Ghamr provisions from the peace treaty stems from our vigilance to do all that is necessary for Jordan and Jordanians.”
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu indicated that Israel will negotiate renewing the agreement with Jordan.
“There is no doubt the agreement is an important asset,” Netanyahu said at a memorial for the late Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin.He added that Israel’s peace deals with Jordan and Egypt are “anchors of regional stability.”
Jordanian foreign minister Ayman Safadi insisted however that Amman would not renegotiate the annexes.
Israeli agricultural minister Uri Ariel reportedly threatened to reduce Israel’s water supply to Jordan if King Abdullah does not reverse his decision.
Ariel called Jordan’s decision a “provocation,” according to media reports.
“I urge Prime Minister Netanyahu to explain to the king that Jordan needs Israel more than Israel needs Jordan,” Ariel said.
The minister warned that the supply of water to the Jordanian capital Amman could be cut from four days per week to just two.
An unnamed Jordanian official pushed back against the threats.
“The agreements governing water affairs between the two countries are intact. We didn’t receive any official communication from the Israeli side on the matter of water sharing, nor are we concerned with any threat,” the senior official told The Jordan Times newspaper.
Other right-wing figures in Israel are also encouraging the Netanyahu government to “punish” Jordan by reducing its water supply.
Support from Jordanian public
Citizens staged protests in Jordan’s capital Amman in the days leading up to the king’s decision not to renew the annexes.In this video, protesters demand that Jordan’s Prime Minister Omar Razzaz cancel the annexes and reclaim al-Baqoura and al-Ghamr: Jordan’s decision not to renew the leases has been broadly welcomed by the Jordanian public and politicians, but the peace treaty with Israel itself remains deeply unpopular and there have been constant calls, including from lawmakers, to cancel it altogether.
That is not likely, however, as Jordan’s external support from the United States and other powers depends on it maintaining its ties with Israel.
Not renewing the annexes over small territories may be a way for Jordanian authorities to appease public opinion at a relatively small cost.
However, the decision may encourage Jordanian campaigners who are pressing the government to cancel its unpopular deal to purchase billions of dollars of gas from Israel.
Ali Abunimah contributed reporting.
- Wadi Araba agreement
- King Abdullah of Jordan
- Yitzhak Rabin
- Jordan river
- Yarmouk river
- Arab normalization
- Dead Sea
- Benjamin Netanyahu
- Ayman Safadi
- Uri Ariel
- Omar Razzaz
Israeli Policy to a T
Permalink Peter Dahu replied on
Make a deal then don't honor it and blame everyone else. Sounds like an Israeli deal.
Permalink Guy St Hilaire replied on
And they have trained the US very well , as this is what treaties and deals are made in the US of Israel.
Purchase billions of gas
Permalink Mark replied on
Given Jordan's location, you'd think there would be plenty of low cost suppliers of gas to choose from.
Permalink Leon replied on
The cancellation of the annexes was pure symbolism. At the most, it will lead the current Israeli greenhouse and factory owners to simply set-up Jordanian shell companies and pay some local taxes. Otherwise, nothing will change and Israel will effectively maintain control over the territories--and rightfully so, since Zionist pioneers developed them back in the 1920s.
Just because a Jew developed
Permalink Peter Dahu replied on
Just because a Jew developed the land doesn't mean Israel has sovereignty over the land. Israel does not equal Jews.
Your racist logic is the same used by white colonizers to justify the ethnic cleansing of Native Americans.
Permalink Lance Dyer replied on
@Leon: those Zio "pioneers"
Permalink Ernesto Che replied on
@Leon: those Zio "pioneers" were infiltrators to start with, who went on to steal the land in Palestine from the Arabs. Any "work" they did on that land was not even their own, they employed Arabs to do it because the Zios had no agricultural expertise in that environment.
Zionists lie as usual, not even able to say the same lie
Permalink Lidia replied on
Leon the apartheid colonizer of Palestine tells not the same lie as a minister and other rulers of the Zionist apartheid colony
Permalink Al replied on
Palestinian pioneers were developing Palestine (which the west and zionists wrongfully call Israel) whilst Zionists came in and inflicted genocide and are forcefully taking over. My point, it is Jordanian land leased out to Israel which under the terms and conditions has been reqested back. So give it back!! But Israel will again as usual play dirty!
This does not sound to good .
Permalink Nasroedien replied on
This does not sound to good ...whatever the outcome of all this,the zionist will erase any attempt to disown them from the land ....this ending is going to be disastrous. ...
Israel the Zionist state...
Permalink Joseph replied on
Israel wants everything from everybody else but themselves.
Permalink eduardoben replied on
Hasn't that area been inhabited since biblical times?