Power Suits 30 August 2019
Gulf elites and politicians are cheering Israel on as it escalates its attacks on Arab countries in the region this month.
Israel bombed sites in Iraq, Syria and Lebanon in the past week alone, with an underlying aggression towards Iran at the core of these attacks.
All the attacks were on sites belonging to groups purportedly supported by Iran. They included the Lebanese resistance organization Hizballah and Iraq’s Popular Mobilization Forces, which helped defeat the Islamic State group also known as ISIS.
Gulf states are salivating at the prospect of directly enlisting Israel’s military might in the proxy war by Saudi Arabia and its allies against Iran.
Bahrain FM defends Israel
Bahrain’s foreign minister Khalid bin Ahmed Al Khalifa defended Israel’s attacks in a tweet on Monday.
“Iran is the one who declared war on us, with its Revolutionary Guards, its Lebanese party, its popular mobilization in Iraq, its Houthi arm in Yemen and others,” Al Khalifa tweeted.“Those who beat them and destroy their equipment are not to blame. It’s self-defense.”
This was not the first time Al Khalifa endorsed Israel’s military attacks against its neighbors.
In the past, Al Khalifa also praised Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and defended Australia’s decision to recognize Jerusalem as Israel’s capital.
Prayer for Israeli victory
Meanwhile, Emirati blogger Hamad Al Mazrouei offered a prayer on Twitter for Israeli victory over Iran.Al Mazrouei has been referred to as a blogger and a journalist by several websites, but he is not registered in the UAE Journalists Association, according to Emirati newspaper The National.
United Arab Emirates businessman Khalaf Al Habtoor called for Arab countries to follow Israel’s example and start attacking their neighbors.“Why aren’t we, Arabs, hitting those targets?” Al Habtoor said in a video he posted on Twitter.
“Israel is hitting them on behalf of Arabs,” he added. “It hits terrorist sites that threaten the entire Arab world, especially us in the Gulf Cooperation Council.”
“We have to hit these locations.”
Al Habtoor also mocked anyone who would refer to Israel as an “enemy.”
Meanwhile, Saudi journalist Abd al-Hamid al-Ghabin wrote about his country’s mutual interests with Israel in a recent piece for Israel Hayom, the highest circulation newspaper in Israel, owned and funded by casino billionaire Sheldon Adelson.
Al-Ghabin suggested on Twitter he will contribute regularly to the newspaper.
“Israel is a logical future partner for us as we have mutual enemies: Iran, the Muslim Brotherhood, al-Qaida and a handful of reckless rulers who remain in power in our region,” he wrote.
He failed to note how Israel has, in fact, supported and even armed al-Qaida-linked militias in Syria.
The Saudi journalist also attacked Palestinian Authority leader Mahmoud Abbas and the Jordanian royal family and media in the same piece.
“We don’t know if the royal family of Jordan will remain in power by the time Jordan officially becomes Palestine,” al-Ghabin stated.
“While Palestinian children die to become ‘martyrs,’ Jordan’s king cruises the Mediterranean in his yacht and Abbas’ sons are likely to be found vacationing in Nova Scotia – the preferred destination, I am told.”
Turning Jordan into an alternative state for Palestinians, so that Israel can seize the whole of historic Palestine, is a longstanding dream of the Israeli far right.
Al-Ghabin appeared on Israel’s i24 News last month calling on Saudi Arabia to seize control over Jerusalem’s holy places from Jordan, which acts as a custodian. Al-Aqsa mosque is one of Islam’s holiest sites.
The Saudi journalist makes the same case in Israel Hayom.
“The king of Jordan has neither been maintaining or protecting the site,” al-Ghabin writes.
“Instead, Saudi Arabia could offer the proper custodianship for al-Aqsa under a new arrangement.”
Al-Ghabin boasted that his country allows Iranians to make pilgrimage to Mecca despite how most “belong to the Shiite sect,” showing clear sectarian prejudice.
Anti-normalization in sports
Egyptian judo athlete Mohamed Abdelaal refused to shake hands with an Israeli judo athlete Sagi Muki following a match at the Judo World Championships in Tokyo this week:President Donald Trump’s Middle East envoy Jason Greenblatt condemned Abdelaal’s decision on Twitter.
“Condolences to Mohamed Abdelaal who lost 2x today – once as an athlete and once as a decent person,” he wrote.Iranian judoka Saeid Mollaei was understood to have intentionally forfeited matches in order to boycott Israeli athletes.
Mollaei lost the match that would qualify him to face Muki.
Israeli media claimed that the Iranian athlete intended to face Muki but faced pressure from Iranian intelligence agents who showed up at the event, as well as Mollaei’s family home.
It is unclear how credible this reporting is.
In the past, an agreement was reached between the International Judo Federation and Iran’s national Olympic committee, conceding that the latter will “fully respect the Olympic Charter and its non-discrimination principle.”
The statement does not name Israel, but the move was understood by Israeli media as a response to Iranian judokas’ refusal to fight Israeli athletes and to forfeit matches instead.
Iran’s national Olympic committee later denied the reversal of the boycott.
- Arab normalization
- Gulf-Israel alliance against Iran
- Gulf Cooperation Council
- Saudi Arabia
- Khalid bin Ahmed Al Khalifa
- Popular Mobilization Forces
- Benjamin Netanyahu
- International Judo Federation
- Hamad Al Mazrouei
- UAE Journalists Association
- Khalaf Al Habtoor
- United Arab Emirates
- Abd al-Hamid al-Ghabin
- Israel Hayom
- Sheldon Adelson
- Mahmoud Abbas
- King Abdullah of Jordan
- Mohamed Abdelaal
- Sagi Muki
- Judo World Championships
- Jason Greenblatt
- Saeid Mollaei
Permalink Al Guttman replied on
Really enjoyed this well informed article
it is wrong to call by any
Permalink علي الحيفاوي replied on
it is wrong to call by any other name other than traitors.
more like cabbages
Permalink John m Costello replied on
I have to disagree. They've been traitors all the generations they've sought to perpetuate their control over society, once the usefulness of their leadership had passed. They are now a decrepit and absurd shroud over the lives of the Arab people. The Arab Spring was a wake-up call for them. They know they can't hope to keep the 18th century out, so they're allowing bits and pieces of the ensuing century's advancements to launder their dirty raiments. That and alignment with our gilded age imperialist Right, are their only hope of holding on to power. Israel's commitment to preserving its 19th century role as a settler-colonial cancer in the global body politic, explains their common cause in this hellish, unnatural, anti-human cabal.
The princes aren't traitors. They would have to have been of the people first and they never were.
My enemy's enemies
Permalink Frank Dallas replied on
Remember that at the peace conference in Lausanne in the spring of 1949 King Abdullah of Jordan joined with Ben-Gurion to scupper the chance of the implementation of UN resolution 194 , which guarantees the right of return to Palestinian refugees and proposes a two-State solution because the two of them wanted to carve up what was left of Palestine between them. Such are the odd conjunctions thrown-up by the mess that is the legacy of resolution 181, the Balfour Declaration and the 1948 ethnic cleansing.
Common enemies are frequently the basis of alliances, but they are always unreliable because they lack principle.
In 1919 the land claimed by the World Zionist Organisation included parts of Egypt, Syria and Lebanon. The current attacks are no innovation. What really motivates the anti-democratic plutocrats who run the Gulf States is Israel's racism, its entrenched white-supremicism, its arms, and its willingness to use extreme violence to ensure its view prevails. The joke is that Israel presents itself as an island of democracy in a sea of despotism. The rulers know better: Israel is a model of denial of democracy. Its apartheid structure serves the needs of the Gulf States for low-paid, foreign workers with no rights.
There is no virtuous regime in this arena. Iran's record on women's rights, on human rights in general is dismal. The place is awash with money but the hands which control it are few. What is missing from the region, and the only thing that can bring peace, is democracy. That is going to be some task, faced with super-rich dynasties, but when Henry VIII was on the throne, who would have thought the land he ruled would one day be governed by its people, at least for the time being.
Add new comment