Anti-Muslim bigots to address AIPAC

Michael F. Brown Lobby Watch 2 March 2020

Man with sword flanked by US and Israeli flags

Myles Holmes, an anti-Muslim and anti-gay pastor, will speak Monday at AIPAC just days after suggesting torture and death for Democratic presidential candidate Pete Buttigieg. (via Facebook)

Pastor Myles Holmes, an anti-Muslim and anti-gay bigot, is scheduled to speak about evangelical support for Israel at the conference of the powerful lobby group AIPAC on Monday.

Holmes is head of Revive USA, an evangelical church based in Illinois.

Last month, the pastor unleashed a tirade against Muslims while bad-mouthing former President Barack Obama.

Despite the rant, or perhaps because of this sort of ugliness, Holmes is listed as a speaker at the annual AIPAC conference.

On his Facebook page, Holmes expressed dismay over a “record number of Muslims working in Obama’s administration.”

He accused Obama of “snuggling up to Muslims” and “horrendous race relations.”

“You pathetic loser, Obama,” he inveighed.

Yet AIPAC is the one that is fast losing support as grassroots Democrats and progressive elected politicians increasingly understand that it is a right-wing organization which backs the subjugation of Palestinians.

With friends like Holmes, who is also aggressively prejudiced against gay and transgender people, AIPAC will continue to lose support from the left and perhaps even the political center.

Torture and death

On Friday, Holmes took exception to how Democratic presidential candidate Pete Buttigieg had responded days earlier to a question from 9-year-old Zachary Ro.

At a rally in Denver, Ro asked Buttigieg, “Would you help me tell the world I’m gay too? I want to be brave like you.”

Buttigieg responded with empathy to the child.

Holmes, however, accused Buttigieg of engaging in “ideological grooming” of the younger generation.

“Buttigieg is a shameful teacher, a shameful role model.”

He accused Buttigieg of refusing to “acknowledge God” and of having a “debased mind.”

Invoking the Bible, Holmes said of Buttigieg that “It would be better for him if a millstone were hung around his neck and he be cast into the sea than that he should cause one of these little ones to sin.”

In other words, the pastor would rather Buttigieg be killed than that he respond to a child struggling with a question of identity in an often bigoted world.

Yet on Monday, Holmes will speak to the AIPAC audience.

He will likely receive a warm welcome from most attending because support for Israel is more important to them than whether a speaker is bigoted against Muslims or anyone else.

Sharing the AIPAC platform with Holmes will be Buttigieg himself – via a video message.

On Sunday night, Buttigieg announced he was dropping out of the race, though he will still presumably address AIPAC.

Maybe Buttigieg does not know about Holmes’ vicious attack, or maybe he will do whatever it takes to curry favor with the pro-Israel lobby, even as AIPAC lends its platform to a man suggesting he should face torture and death.

Now that this information is public, Buttigieg will have a decision to make: Chase the future votes and campaign donations of anti-Palestinian racists at AIPAC or reject the bigotry the Israel lobby group is offering from its platform.

Holmes will not be alone at AIPAC.

Other anti-Muslim bigots are attending the 1-3 March conference, most notably Serbian President Aleksandar Vucic, who said, “For every Serb killed, we will kill 100 Muslims.”

Vucic uttered these words just days before the genocide by Bosnian Serb military forces of thousands of Muslim men and boys in the Bosnian town of Srebrenica.

Bipartisan bigotry

AIPAC advertises itself as one of the few successful bipartisan organizations in Washington.

But in reality it has been losing Democratic support as presidential candidates Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren skip its conference while expressing varying degrees of dissent from its policies.

AIPAC’s invitation to Holmes backs up the case Sanders made for not attending – that the lobby group provides a platform for bigotry.

For his rejection of AIPAC’s hatemongering, Sanders was attacked by some of the most anti-Palestinian politicians and leaders from across the political spectrum.
Many of these politicians would claim they’re for equal rights at home or in other countries, but when it comes to Palestinians they have repeatedly ignored their rights or actively undercut them.

Congresswoman Betty McCollum did commend Sanders and Warren for skipping the AIPAC conference.

This came after McCollum recently denounced AIPAC as a “hate group” – uncharacteristically strong language from an American politician.

Mike Bloomberg will be at AIPAC in person, while Joe Biden and Amy Klobuchar will deliver video messages.

As a long-time senator and then vice-president, Biden has spent his career helping to fund Israel’s occupation and subjugation of Palestinians.

Though AIPAC is quickly losing its progressive grassroots support, elected Democratic centrists continue to attend its conference.

By doing so, they signal to constituents that they are not troubled by Israel’s occupation of Palestinian territory and certainly not upset enough by the lack of Palestinian freedom to do anything about it.

There are 23 Democratic members of Congress scheduled to address AIPAC plus two Democratic staffers.

Only 13 Republican members are expected to speak.

Bipartisanship in Washington, it seems, finds a home in rejecting any serious effort to advance Palestinian rights and freedom.

AIPAC, which is desperate to shore up Democratic support even as it attacks leading progressive Democrats, has seemingly successfully secured Democratic backing for another year.

But the gap continues to grow between grassroots Democrats and their elected officials.

Democratic politicians flocking to the conference may one day have to face constituents fed up with their representatives’ embrace of an organization giving a platform to so much hatred.

November’s election could serve as one such occasion.

Tags

Comments

picture

Zionism Is Not Judaism replied on

Myles who? Never heard of him until you brought him to our attention. Just what we want to know about, another latter day Elmer Gantry pseudo religious charlatan shaman. The things that are said and done in the name of Jesus.

THANKS A LOT BUDDY.

PS. What is with the Samurai sword?

picture

John Evans replied on

I have heard of the name and attend his church. Glad I do not attend his church no more. I do not call him a preacher but cult leader. He is very anti everything and if you disagree with him you are brainwashed

picture

Frank Dallas replied on

Bloomberg castigates Sanders for calling AIPAC racist. Yet his preamble is to praise the US support for Israel since 1948 without a hint of a suggestion that any aspect of Israel's behaviour might sensibly be called racist. In Bloomberg's eschatology, the US-Israel relationship stands for democracy, justice, compassion, innovation, integrity-choose any bit of motherhood and apple pie you like. Not a word from Bloomberg about the fate of the Palestinians, not a glimmer of recognition that the US and Israel have been consistently rejectionist with regard to a two-State solution. What does Bloomberg have to say about the Israeli invasion of Lebanon in 1982, for example? What is his view of the Ansar concentration camp? What does he have to say about. What does he have to say about the incident, reported in Chomsky's Fateful Triangle, of the Lebanese woman abused by Haddad forces with the complicity of the IDF: raped by Hadded soldiers who tried to make her copulate with a dog? Is that compassion, democracy, an example of the valuse shared by the US and Israel? What does he have to say about Deir Yassin? What does Bloomberg think about Sabra and Shatila? Bloomberg santises a regime guilty of consistent human rights abuses for the simple reason it doesn't accept that Palestinians are human in the same way as Jews. As Weizmann said: "There is a qualitative difference between a Jew and an Arab." What lies behind Bloomberg's bland nonsense is interest before principle. What the US support for Israel since 1948 is about is mendacity, brutality, racism, double standards, thought control, denial of democracy, insult to the international community, defiance of international law. Principle is dumped to defend interest. That is the short route to the triumph of evil. And AIPAC is a front for Israeli interests. Israel is an oppressive racist State and to save itself and live in peace in needs to reject both oppression and racism. Netanyahu? Not a chance.

picture

Stefano R. Baldari replied on

No further evidence is necessary to substantiate conclusively that AIPAC is a hate group--aligning themselves with the likes of Myles Holmes and Michael Bloomberg. It was Mr. Bloomberg who has recently defended the surveillance of Muslims program while Mayor of New York; and a man who is a bigoted racist and continually defends a white supremacist apartheid state, Israel! "Birds of a feather, flock together."
"

Michael F. Brown

Michael F. Brown is an independent journalist. His work and views have appeared in The International Herald Tribune, TheNation.com, The San Diego Union-Tribune, The News & Observer, The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, The Washington Post and elsewhere.