US judge throws out key claim against academic boycott of Israel

Israel and its surrogates suffered a significant defeat last week, when a federal court in Washington, DC, threw out a key claim in a lawsuit against the American Studies Association for its resolution to boycott Israeli academic institutions.

The lawsuit, filed by current and former members of the ASA last year, argued that the 2013 resolution was a breach of contract because it did not fall within the scope of the group’s mission.

The complaint appeared to be a test of a new lawfare tactic that accuses an entity of acting beyond its chartered purpose – a claim that it is acting ultra vires, in legal language.

Anti-Palestinian activists hoped the strategy could be used to thwart other academic groups adopting boycott resolutions.

But US District Judge Rudolph Contreras dismissed the claim on 31 March, writing that the boycott resolution was enacted “in furtherance of the ASA’s purpose of advancing education and the promotion of the study of American culture.”

“The boycott resolution was aimed both at encouraging academic freedom for Palestinians and strengthening relations between American institutions and Palestinians,” the judge wrote. “Thus, it was not contrary to the ASA’s express purposes.”

“The court echoed what we’ve been saying all along,” Radhika Sainath, an attorney with Palestine Legal, said in a statement.

“Significant victory”

The judge is allowing other parts of the lawsuit to proceed, among them accusations of “breach of contract” and “corporate waste.” The next phase is discovery, which involves the parties disclosing information and evidence to each other.

Nevertheless, Palestine Legal says the ruling is a significant victory.

“Israel advocacy groups are throwing every legal argument at this movement to see what will stick, and nothing’s sticking,” Sainath said.

“We’re encouraged that the court will ultimately see this lawsuit as an attempt by powerful actors to silence views they don’t like.”

According to Palestine Legal, the ASA was initially threatened with legal action on the basis of “discrimination and anti-Semitism” if it did not repeal its academic boycott resolution.

But that route was abandoned in favor of the ultra vires claim, which has now been thrown out.

Lawfare

According to Palestine Legal, that tactic was first developed in 2015 by Northwestern University law professor Eugene Kontorovich, a vocal supporter of Israel’s West Bank settlements who reportedly lives in one such colony.

Kontorovich, who served as an adviser to the plaintiffs, is one of several prominent anti-boycott advocates who helped advance the case against the ASA. He is also a fellow of the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs, a right-wing Israeli think tank governed by a who’s who of Israeli political and military figures.

Representing the four plaintiffs is Jerome Marcus, a senior fellow at the Kohelet Policy Forum, an Israeli think tank with a stated purpose “to anchor the Jewish People’s inherent right to an independent sovereign state in Israeli law and policy.”

Kenneth Marcus, the head of the Israel advocacy group the Louis Brandeis Center for Human Rights, was also listed as an attorney for the plaintiffs.

Marcus led a failed effort to use Title VI of the 1964 Civil Rights Act to instigate a federal crackdown on Palestine solidarity activism at several universities.

The Israeli government has given specific backing to the tactic of using lawsuits in an effort to thwart the boycott, divestment and sanctions movement.

Previously, Shurat HaDin, a lawfare group linked to Israel’s Mossad intelligence service, had threatened to sue the American Studies Association as well, but never filed a complaint.

Financial claims

The lawsuit argues that as a result of the resolution, the ASA has suffered a decline in membership and lost revenue from membership dues.

But the ASA says that its membership has actually grown and it has received more grants and contributions following the adoption of the the boycott resolution.

A total of $49,000 was donated specifically in support of the resolution, according to ASA executive director John Stephens, the judge noted.

But Stephens testified that the ASA has had to spend a considerable portion of those funds to defend itself against the backlash to the resolution.

ASA has spent $20,000 on a media strategist and over $15,000 on boycott-related expenses during annual meetings, according to Stephens.

The organization has not lost any money as a result of the resolution, according to Stephens, but made a small net gain.

But in allowing the case to proceed, the judge says those figures do not discount that the organization could financially suffer in the long run.

Tags

Comments

picture

My first thought is that the solution to the pro-Israel legal campaign is to get a fighting fund together, and start suing any organization that supports the "*Jewish* state of Israel" as racist and violating the Constitution. The Israel lobby consistently cries "antisemitism". You have to be equally consistent in a counterattack of "racist" and "apartheid."

picture

The counterpoint: racist and apartheid [exactly defines the Israeli state] is spot on. Rafa makes good points.
IMHO, it astounds me that the racist horrific Nazi Holocaust is cited by Israel and Israeli supporters to justify and support occupation of Palestine and the Zionist agenda. If you are not zionist you are anti-semitic... Now that puts a spin on things!
Fight back. Push back. Be strong and know that you will be defamed by the experts of "anti-defamation" until the whole world becomes aware and says, "No. No more. Israel may no longer get a pass on the brutal mistreatment of Palestine: the land and the People."

picture

This is a mighty accomplishment by Palestine Legal. As U.S. District Judge Rudolph Contreras rightly stated, the boycott resolution was enacted "in...advancing education and the promotion of the study of American culture", as well as "encouraging academic freedom for Palestinians..." Read FREEDOM OF SPEECH!
It is the oxygen of academic freedom and free speech that will ultimately put to rest people like Eugene Kontorovich, Kenneth Marcus, and organizations like Shurat HaDin and that extra legal institution par excellence, Mossad. It will also bring to light, as it is now happening the world over just what Illegitimate Israel is all about--apartheid.
But, this "victory" is only just the beginning, power must be wrested and seized from the Illegitimate Israel Lobby. And, that will be done by Palestine Legal as well as many such organization that believe in justice and equality and will act as the countervailing force against Israel, Zionism, Zionists and their supporters.
Bravissimo to Palestine Legal and to Judge Rudolph Contreras!

Add new comment

Charlotte Silver

Charlotte Silver's picture

Charlotte Silver is an independent journalist and regular writer for The Electronic Intifada. She is based in Oakland, California and has reported from Palestine since 2010. Follow her on Twitter @CharESilver.