Rasmea Odeh may get new trial, US appeal court rules

Rasmea Odeh

Ali Abunimah

A US court of appeals vacated the conviction of Palestinian American activist Rasmea Odeh on Thursday, returning her case to the district judge for a possible retrial.

In November 2014, Odeh, 68, was convicted of immigration fraud for failing to disclose her 1969 arrest and conviction by the Israeli military on her immigration and naturalization documents filed respectively in 1994 and 2005.

Her lawyers appealed her conviction on the basis that US District Judge Gershwin Drain had denied Odeh the opportunity to present a complete defense by prohibiting her from speaking about the torture and abuse she endured that led to her signing a false confession in 1969.

Drain refused to allow Odeh to call Mary Fabri, an expert on toture, who had submitted an affidavit for the defense stating that that Odeh suffered from post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) from her torture, including rape, by Israeli interrogators.

Torture testimony

Fabri testified that Odeh’s PTSD may have affected her state of mind when she failed to disclose her military court conviction on her citizenship application.

The panel of three justices reviewed Fabri’s testimony and unanimously agreed that the trial judge erred on his basis for excluding it from Odeh’s trial.

Judge Drain had barred it on the basis that Odeh was charged with a “general intent” crime rather than a “specific intent” crime – a legal distinction he held would make her state of mind irrelevant to the case.

“Regardless of whether [it] was a specific or general intent crime,” the ruling states, “Dr. Fabri’s proffered testimony is relevant to whether Odeh knew that her statements were false.”

Now Judge Drain must determine if there is another basis on which to exclude the expert testimony. Failing that, Odeh will be allowed to have a new a trial with the expert testimony.

“I feel confident she will get a new trial,” Michael Deutsch, Odeh’s lead attorney, told The Electronic Intifada.

“I don’t see another reasonable reason to exclude the expert testimony.”

Deutsch called the appellate court’s ruling a “a great victory.”

The Rasmea Defense Committee is calling today’s decision a “partial victory.”

“The conviction wasn’t overturned altogether, but at least Judge Drain will be forced to rethink his decision on the torture evidence,” the defense committee’s Nesreen Hasan said in a press release.

The Center for Constitutional Rights had filed a brief supporting Odeh’s appeal, on behalf of five organizations with expertise on the impact of torture, including the International Rehabilitation Council for Torture Victims, Bellevue/NYU Program For Survivors of Torture, Public Committee Against Torture In Israel, REDRESS and the World Organization Against Torture.

Prejudicial material

Odeh’s defense had also argued that the government should not have been permitted to use Israeli military court documents during Odeh’s trial.

The documents included the Israeli military’s indictment against Odeh.

In 1969, Odeh was convicted of helping coordinate two bombings in West Jerusalem that caused the death of two civilians.

Odeh maintained that the conviction by an Israeli military court was the result of her prolonged torture.

Her defense argued that these details were prejudicial in a trial that was concerned with alleged immigration fraud, not her decades-old conviction.

One of the justices in the appellate court agreed that those details should have been excluded.

Attorney Deutsch told The Electronic Intifada that if there is a retrial, Odeh’s defense will argue again that those military court documents should be left out of the courtroom.




This is a welcome bit of good news. Let's hope it ends with her complete vindication.

She seems to have a good legal team, but if anyone knows how send her letters of support or to offer any needed assistance, please let me know (here or by email at michaellesher@optonline.net).

This case should be a source of shame not only for Israel -- and for its U.S. patron -- but for this country's mass media, when torture, rape and a criminal occupation barely merited mention in the coverage of Ms. Odeh's show trial.


If Judge Drain tries to concoct another excuse or technicality to deny justice for this woman it will speak to his...."objectivity".


This is very good news. It will be difficult for corporate news media to cover the story now without mentioning torture and rape at the hands of the Israeli military, followed by a false confession.

Hopefully, the illegitimacy of the military occupation courts will be introduced as the case reenters the US court system.

Renewed support goes out to Ms Odeh from well-wishers everywhere.

Charlotte Silver

Charlotte Silver's picture

Charlotte Silver is an independent journalist and regular writer for The Electronic Intifada. She is based in Oakland, California and has reported from Palestine since 2010. Follow her on Twitter @CharESilver.