|
The following is an update from Physicians for Human Rights-Israel: One cancer patient, Na'el al-Kordi, died in Gaza while awaiting an answer from the state of Israel. Seven other patients in life-threatening condition are still in Gaza. In its hearing on 12 November 2007, the Israeli high court avoided addressing Israeli policy regarding access of Gaza patients to care, or General Security Service (GSS) coercion of patients at the crossing, and delayed its decision regarding life-threatening cases by seven days. PHR-Israel's three demands as presented to the state in the High Court of Justice (HCJ) petition, 7 November 2007: Court hearing results, 12 November 2007: Results on the ground: State response, 19 November: PHR-Israel will demand an urgent second High Court hearing. The remaining five patients who are refused entry: The death of Na'el al-Kordi Na'el al-Kordi, aged 21, was diagnosed with cancer (seminoma) in February 2006. He was operated at Shifaa' hospital, Gaza, in March 2006, and underwent radiotherapy in Egypt in April 2006, followed by continuation of chemotherapy in Gaza. In January 2007 his condition worsened and in March he was diagnosed with secondary tumors. He was referred to a medical center in Egypt for care but encountered difficulties in reaching regular sessions due to repeated closures of Rafah Crossing into Egypt. His tumor shrank by 50 percent, and there was a chance of saving his life if granted follow up and appropriate care. Following the final closure of the crossing into Egypt on 9 June 2007, Na'el attempted to exit Gaza into Ichilov hospital in Israel, via Erez Crossing, but was refused by the Israeli authorities "on security grounds." Appeals on his behalf by PHR-Israel failed to reverse this decision. In October he was diagnosed as suffering from secondary tumors in the liver and obstruction jaundice; his condition deteriorated rapidly. Although three Israeli doctors submitted written statements according to which his condition was very urgent and further delay of care would endanger his life, in the hearing on 12 November the Court failed to demand that the state grant him passage. On 17 November he died in his home in Gaza. Next day, the State Attorney informed PHR-Israel's attorney that he had been granted a permit. PHR-Israel believes that the GSS defines security in a narrow-sighted and manipulative manner, in order to justify the Israeli government's stated policy of collective measures against the civilian population of Gaza. PHR-Israel is disappointed by the decision of the high court to avoid addressing these policy issues. PHR-Israel reminds the government of Israel and the international community that deliberate withholding of medical care for reasons external to medical considerations can in extreme cases constitute cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment as defined in the UN Convention Against Torture. Since Israel controls the sole exit point from Gaza to the outside world, it bears sole responsibility for access of patients to care, irrespective of the legal status of Gaza as occupied territory. PHR-Israel emphatically condemns the policies of the Israeli government regarding Gaza, as well as the failure of international governments to oppose the policy of isolation implemented against the 1.4 million protected civilians of Gaza. Related Links
|