Coverage Trends
EI's Coverage Trends section offers analysis of media reports and reporting trends, including issues of balance, selective reporting, buried stories, and outright distortion. Quality submissions are welcomed.
How Palestinian children really learn
Carol Scheller, The Electronic Intifada, 15 April 2008
On 22 March, The Miami Herald published an article entitled "Dreaming of a peaceful Mideast." The initial reaction to such a headline is naturally one of pleased interest. Reporter Frida Ghitis praises the Israel/Palestine Centre for Research and Information for "working to create" a "culture of peace" in order to "put a stop to incitement and hatred." Carol Scheller comments for EI. [MORE]
British commentary pages ignore Gaza's plight
Report, Arab Media Watch, 15 February 2008
Arab Media Watch expresses concern at the lack of critical commentary in the British press on Israel's recent decision to intensify its siege of the Gaza Strip by withholding vital fuel supplies and increasing military attacks. Israel's actions have resulted in civilian deaths, a worsening humanitarian crisis, the breach of Gaza's border with Egypt, and bleaker prospects for the resumption of peace talks. Nonetheless, there has been no comment whatsoever in The Sun, Daily Mail, Daily Mirror, Daily Star and Evening Standard. [MORE]
Mainstream media caught in the MEMRI mouse trap
Tom Wallace, The Electronic Intifada, 14 May 2007
Normally CNN, FOX, MSNBC and the New York Times have little in common with each other, let alone blogs like little green footballs, Americablog or the Huffington Post. But when it comes to disseminating Israel's message, all are on the same page. On May 8, CNN, FOX and MSNBC began reporting on a Hamas-created children's show, currently broadcast on Al Aqsa TV in Gaza, which features a Mickey Mouse-like cartoon character who does everything from teaching kids about the benefits of drinking milk to disseminating what CNN's Jim Clancy described as "powerful message of HATE, RESISTANCE and DEFIANCE [sic]". [MORE]
Buying the War on Palestinians: The US Media, The New York Times and Israel
Patrick O'Connor, The Electronic Intifada, 2 May 2007
After four disastrous years of US military occupation, Bill Moyers' April 25 PBS special Buying the War attempted to hold the mainstream US media accountable for its complicity in selling the war on Iraq to the US public. Tragically, despite the terrible consequences of 60 years of Israeli oppression of the Palestinian people, there is still no significant movement to hold the US mainstream media accountable for a similar, dramatic failure in covering Israel and Palestine, and for its complicity in the US' uncritical support for Israel. [MORE]
Concern over BBC documentary 'Will Israel Bomb Iran?'
Report, Arab Media Watch, 13 February 2007
Arab Media Watch is concerned by the 'This World' programme 'Will Israel Bomb Iran?', broadcast on BBC2 on 10 October 2006. Its severe lack of balance manifested itself in the number and range of sources used, the airtime given them, and the numerous unchallenged claims made about the Arab world. A statistical analysis of 'Will Israel Bomb Iran?' yields these figures: Israeli sources, of which there were 15, appeared 55 times for a total of 15 minutes and 58 seconds - 51% of talk time, 41.4% of the programme, 71.4% of sources and 45% of source appearances. In stark contrast, the Iranian sources, of which there were just two, appeared three times for a total of 52 seconds. [MORE]
Who is Mohammad Dahlan?
Arjan El Fassed, The Electronic Intifada, 20 December 2006
Dahlan was a founding member of Shabiba, the youth association of Fatah, head of the Preventive Security Force in Gaza, cabinet minister, security advisor and legislator. During the 1990s he headed a force of 20,000 troops in Gaza. He has good relations with Israel, US and other foreign powers. Both Dahlan and his colleague in the West Bank, Jibril Rajoub, were implicted in financial scandals and human rights violations. Dahlan has a history in trying to curb Hamas. His troops were involved in one of the largest Palestinian arbitrary arrest campaign in recent history. Today, Dahlan has become the face of one side of Fatah as violence increased between Hamas and Fatah. [MORE]
The New York Times Marginalizes Palestinian Women and Palestinian Rights
Patrick O'Connor and Rachel Roberts, The Electronic Intifada, 17 November 2006
A November 7, 2006 New York Times news article about a Human Rights Watch report on domestic violence against Palestinian women brings welcome attention to human rights issues. Unfortunately, the same article, viewed in the context of The New York Times' reporting on Israel/Palestine over the last six years, provides a powerful example of typical US mainstream media bias against Palestinians. Research shows clearly that The New York Times pays little attention to human rights in Israel/Palestine, downplays the larger context in which violence against Palestinian women occurs and generally silences Palestinian women's voices. By omitting crucial details and emphasizing certain others, The New York Times, one of the US' most respected and powerful media outlets, has turned a valuable piece of human rights reporting into a tool that can be used to reinforce a Western agenda that has cynically exploited "saving Muslim women" as an excuse for dominating and abusing the rights of people from other cultures. [MORE]
The New York Times Marginalizes Palestinian Women and Palestinian Rights
Patrick O'Connor and Rachel Roberts, The Electronic Intifada, 17 November 2006
A November 7, 2006 New York Times news article about a Human Rights Watch report on domestic violence against Palestinian women brings welcome attention to human rights issues. Unfortunately, the same article, viewed in the context of The New York Times' reporting on Israel/Palestine over the last six years, provides a powerful example of typical US mainstream media bias against Palestinians. Research shows clearly that The New York Times pays little attention to human rights in Israel/Palestine, downplays the larger context in which violence against Palestinian women occurs and generally silences Palestinian women's voices. By omitting crucial details and emphasizing certain others, The New York Times, one of the US' most respected and powerful media outlets, has turned a valuable piece of human rights reporting into a tool that can be used to reinforce a Western agenda that has cynically exploited "saving Muslim women" as an excuse for dominating and abusing the rights of people from other cultures. [MORE]
Israel's Large-Scale Killing of Palestinians Passes Unreported
Patrick O'Connor, The Electronic Intifada, 4 November 2006
The year 2006 has seen by far the most skewed ratio of Palestinians to Israelis killed. While no deaths should be accepted, the figures show that the Israeli war machine has shifted into an unprecedented frenzy. Through the entire second Palestinian intifada or uprising which began September 29, 2000, approximately 3.9 Palestinians have been killed for every Israeli killed.[4] The highest previous multi-month ratio of Palestinians to Israelis killed during this intifada occurred from March to December 2004 when around 9.5 Palestinians were killed for every Israeli. In the first Palestinian intifada from 1987-92, 5.2 Palestinians were killed for every Israeli. [MORE]
BBC publishes list of "key terms" used in Israel-Palestinian conflict
News, BBC News Online, 19 October 2006
The BBC Governors' independent panel report on the impartiality of BBC coverage of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict recommended that the BBC should make public an abbreviated version of its journalists' guide to facts and terminology. The following list of terms used in the conflict, their definitions, and notes for their correct usage, reveals a news organization trying to find a balance between accurate reporting and leaning towards the semantics of the Israeli side in the conflict. [MORE]
|
|
|
