Israeli army propaganda photograph showing patients treated in the Philippines. (Source)
When Typhoon Yolanda (known internationally as Typhoon Haiyan) struck the Philippines on 6 November, it left behind a massive streak of destruction and death in the central Philippines. As of 16 November, the authorities counted almost 3,700 fatalities in the Philippines.
The storm is a massive humanitarian catastrophe and even the best preparations could not save every life.
Countries around the globe pledged money and aid. Even Vietnam, a country with a smaller gross domestic product than the Philippines and which was also affected by the storm, pledged support.
It is not surprising then that Israel sprang into action, as it has after so many recent natural disasters, including earthquakes in Haiti and Japan. However, the Israeli army does not quietly and humbly spread tikkun olam – reparation of the world. It brings a public relations team.
The Israeli army created a new Twitter account on 12 November named @IDFRescue. The first tweet was:
The choice of the #IDFWithoutBorders hashtag struck me as an unintended irony, because Israel itself is a state without defined borders that has militarily occupied the territory of every neighboring country and presently occupies the Gaza Strip, the West Bank, Syria’s Golan Heights and territory in south Lebanon.
Given international condemnation of Israel’s relentless expansion of colonial settlements into occupied territories, it is hard to think of a more unfortunate hashtag from an Israeli propaganda perspective.
Lieutenant Colonel Peter Lerner, the commander of the Israeli army’s international media department, even requested that the anti-Palestinian group StandWithUs use the correct hashtag when promoting the army’s relief mission.
It took a few days for this unintended irony to sink in, and they stopped using it and it never caught on.
Propaganda or just information?
Most of that content is in the English language, but the Israeli army is also producing French and Spanish language content. One goal of producing so much content would be to inform people back home about the army’s more picturesque activities, but neither English, French or Spanish are official languages of the State of Israel. So which public is the army trying to appeal to?
Given the resources devoted to this public relations initiative, one major goal must be to impress an international audience with the Israeli army’s charity and humanity. They have likely made achievements toward that end.
Many grateful mothers have delivered babies into the hands of Israeli army physicians working in the Philippines. Propaganda activists celebrated the birth of one boy, dubbed “Baby Israel.”
There is an explicit connection between Israeli army propaganda and its humanitarian aid to the Philippines. The terms “bluewash” and “bluewashing” have been used to criticize corporate relationships with the United Nations Global Compact to displace negative perceptions of a corporation’s environmental and humanitarian effects.
In 2003, George Monbiot writing in The Guardian described the effort to use a United Nations mandate for the US occupation of Iraq as “bluewash”:
Until the UN, controlled by the five permanent members of the security council, has itself been democratized, it is hard to see how it can claim the moral authority to oversee a transition to democracy anywhere else. This problem is compounded by the fact that Britain, which is hardly likely to be perceived as an honest broker, is about to assume the council’s presidency. A UN mandate may be regarded by Iraqis as bluewash, an attempt to grant retrospective legitimacy to an illegal occupation.
Why blue? Because blue is the official color of the United Nations flag and the color of helmets worn by its peacekeeping forces, it is strongly associated with political, international humanitarianism.
The term “bluewashing” is of course a portmanteau of the words “blue” and “whitewash,” which is generally a metaphor for censorship of real scandals and crimes. While the Israeli army is contributing to the reconstruction of the Philippines where there is real need, it is also the primary contributor to the worsening conditions in Gaza where electricity is in short supply and clean water is running out.
In 2006, Israel killed at least 1,000 Lebanese — mostly civilians — and destroyed civilian infrastructure such as bridges and schools. Israel has never been held accountable for these war crimes.
A humanitarian catastrophe in Syria has pushed millions of refugees into neighboring countries, while Israel has made small efforts to provide health care to a few Syrians. The Israeli army’s minuscule efforts to provide relief for a handful of Syrians are over-exposed in the world media, while refugee camps and cities in Jordan, Turkey and Lebanon are overcrowded with Syrians escaping violence. There is no other country that does so little and makes so much noise about it.
A key message of Israeli bluewashing is that Israel brings special expertise to solve humanitarian and environmental problems.
What this propaganda conceals is the extent to which Israel is directly responsible for environmental catastrophes afflicting millions of Palestinians, especially the pollution and degradation of water resources and the destruction of water infrastructure. The same week that Israeli forces were deployed to the Philippines, Palestinian children in Gaza were wading to school in sewage because of the collapse of infrastructure due to the Israeli blockade.
In the West Bank, on top of severe water shortages caused by Israeli exploitation of water resources, Palestinians are frequently victims of settlements dumping their sewage on their farmland.
“He who saves one life, saves the entire world.”
An Israeli army propaganda video from 2012 demonstrates the brazen, exploitative nature of Israel’s bluewashing strategy. At the very end, a quote is displayed by the Jewish philosopher Maimonides.
He who saves one life saves the world.
Scholars regard this statement as a very notable rephrasing of a passage from the Babylonian Talmud (37a), which Maimonides universalized by removing specificity to Israel or Jews. In the Talmud, the passage reads:
Whoever destroys a soul, it is considered as if he destroyed an entire world. And whoever saves a life, it is considered as if he saved an entire world.
Israel’s bluewashing in the Philippines does not make us forget the souls it has destroyed.